An old draft has been available for yonks through
http://www.cs.otago.ac.nz/staffpriv/ok/software.htm
There are two *major* changes not included in that release
and not quite finished yet.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 07:09, Esteban Maringolo
wrote:
> El dom., 17 mar. 2019 a las 6:33, Sven Van
Isn't this an "ultimate" goal for Pharo ... once you've got a stable
(truly) minimum image, custom class libraries are possible if not
desirable ...
Dale
On 3/18/19 11:08 AM, Esteban Maringolo wrote:
El dom., 17 mar. 2019 a las 6:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe
() escribió:
On 17 Mar 2019, at
El dom., 17 mar. 2019 a las 6:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe
() escribió:
>
>
>
> > On 17 Mar 2019, at 07:56, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> >
> > (1) As it happens, my Smalltalk library *does* have
>
> "my mystery Smalltalk" ;-)
Codename "Unicorn". :)
Jokes aside, I'd love to see such implementation
And looking at this in the code - there are quite a few variations of
#includes… that I don’t think it makes sense to write the mirror of all of
them. Not it is...
> On 18 Mar 2019, at 16:48, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> Thanks guys - I always learn something new from these threads.
>
>> On 17
Thanks guys - I always learn something new from these threads.
> On 17 Mar 2019, at 06:56, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> (1) As it happens, my Smalltalk library *does* have
> #excludes: and #identityExcludes:
> (2) The definitions are trivial.
> excludes: item
> ^(self includes:
> On 17 Mar 2019, at 07:56, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> (1) As it happens, my Smalltalk library *does* have
"my mystery Smalltalk" ;-)
> #excludes: and #identityExcludes:
> (2) The definitions are trivial.
> excludes: item
> ^(self includes: item) not
> identityExcludes:
(1) As it happens, my Smalltalk library *does* have
#excludes: and #identityExcludes:
(2) The definitions are trivial.
excludes: item
^(self includes: item) not
identityExcludes: item
^(self identityIncludes: item) not
If you want to execute aBlock when aString is not all
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 17:05, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
> These are all good suggestions guys - but don’t you find it odd that there
> isn’t the mirror function #excludes: which would make all of them read more
> naturally?
>
> I know we can’t have all combinations- but this one really struck me as
>
These are all good suggestions guys - but don’t you find it odd that there
isn’t the mirror function #excludes: which would make all of them read more
naturally?
I know we can’t have all combinations- but this one really struck me as odd by
its absence (particularly when I was comparing the
> On 15 Mar 2019, at 23:06, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
>
> aString detect: [:c | ($0 to: $1) excludes: c] ifFound: aBlock. (Evaluate a
> block if the string isn’t all 0 and 1’s)
(aString allSatisfy: [ :each | '01' includes: each ]) not.
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 06:33, Tim Mackinnon wrote:
> Hi - in my quest to understand the edgier details of Pharo (and Smalltalk)
> - and driven by fresh thoughts of completing exercism exercises - I was
> surprised to find that there is no #excludes: operation on collection to
> mirror the
Hi - in my quest to understand the edgier details of Pharo (and Smalltalk) -
and driven by fresh thoughts of completing exercism exercises - I was surprised
to find that there is no #excludes: operation on collection to mirror the
#includes: operation?
I was curious about this - its seems a
12 matches
Mail list logo
