> Fine with me too.
On a second thought, people like me who commit changes and
are not subscribed to php-dev, would not receive the replies
which are intended for them, if follow-ups would be
automatically directed to php-dev.
Hence, the current way is good. I didn't have any
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > I think we can instruct the listmanager to set a Reply-To header
> > instead, would that be a nice idea?
>
> Nope,
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> When I was still subscribed to php-cvs, I frequently replied
>
> I think we can instruct the listmanager to set a Reply-To header
> instead, would that be a nice idea?
Nope,
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
When I was still subscribed to php-cvs, I frequently replied
to people in private. Munging reply-to would make that a lot
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> If you need to comment on a commit, can you please change the To/Cc line
> from php-cvs to php-dev.
>
> It makes trawling through the commits quite hard when there are
> massively long threads in there that should really be discussed in the
Hey guys,
If you need to comment on a commit, can you please change the To/Cc line
from php-cvs to php-dev.
It makes trawling through the commits quite hard when there are
massively long threads in there that should really be discussed in the
developers "forum" (and they are more likely to be see
