I don't think it helps. It won't inline these functions in most cases
anyway, and having or not having a symbol shouldn't make a difference.
I'd prefer to stick to our standards and keep all extensions the same. Who
knows if/when we'll want to play around with the symbols also. It could come
in han
Andi,
I think the idea here was to minimize memory utilization and allow
the compiler to optimize the code better, something that having
functions defined as statics appears to help with.
On 26-Aug-06, at 11:30 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why is this important? We never defined these as stati
Why is this important? We never defined these as static. As long as you move
them to the .c file (for whatever reason you have that might be justified)
you really don't have to define them as static IMO.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, Au