I suspect that PostgreSQL would log anything related to a network
connection problem if the error logging level was set correctly.
If you don't see any of those perhaps it is a networking issue. You
might need to try an ethernet capture tool like Wireshark or perhaps
something like tcpflow.
Hi all,
Imagine that you want to put some 2 historical photos On display in
your website , you use PHP and MySQL.
Preparing a photo album with 200 photos is no problem but for 2 photos!
would you do it in the same way?
Please comment.
---
Sorry but I don't see where the problem would be.
Aleksander
Quoting elk dolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all,
Imagine that you want to put some 2 historical photos On
display in your website , you use PHP and MySQL.
Preparing a photo album with 200 photos is no problem but for
Hi
> Imagine that you want to put some 2 historical photos On display in
> your website , you use PHP and MySQL.
> Preparing a photo album with 200 photos is no problem but for 2 photos!
> would you do it in the same way?
Yes, but I don't necessarily see the need for a db.
If y
bedul wrote:
plz remind to send to us your aplication.. the problem may cause from your
sintax don't match the version
No - *don't* send us your application.
Only send us the relevant lines from the script if you can't work it out.
--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/
-
I have written a generic sql database class which contains a method RunQuery
which uses mssql_query. To catch errors, should I include the "or die" clause
or should I wrap it in a try/exception block? The first will stop the script
running but for a generic class, I was thinking it'd be better
The DB and MDB2 packages in the PEAR library use a third option, which is to
return an "Error" subclass as the result rather than "throw"ing it. Prons
and cons for all, just wanted to throw in this option too.
Btw, both the DB and MDB2 packages are already generic classes that support
mssql as we
