Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Jason Wong
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 14:14, Lester Caine wrote: I want LAFP but LAPP seems still to be more popular on Linux. WHY does everybody run lemming like after MySQL. It STILL has to catch up with the better FREE database engines ;) It depends on your needs. For simple storage of data

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Lester Caine
Jason Wong wrote: I want LAFP but LAPP seems still to be more popular on Linux. WHY does everybody run lemming like after MySQL. It STILL has to catch up with the better FREE database engines ;) It depends on your needs. For simple storage of data (involving few relationships) then MySQL is more

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Jason Wong
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 15:34, Lester Caine wrote: It depends on your needs. For simple storage of data (involving few relationships) then MySQL is more than sufficient and a tried and tested solution. This probably covers the vast majority of the data storage needs of web apps. No

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread John W. Holmes
From: Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd really like to find a Linux distro that is a LAMP system right out of the box. (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) Are there any out there? Thankfully not ;) I want LAFP but LAPP seems still to be more popular on Linux. WHY does everybody run lemming

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Lester Caine
John W. Holmes wrote: Right... I find a great need for triggers and stored procedures in my guestbooks and shoutboxes. Come on people, the right tool for the right job. MySQL is supported on more hosts and fills the needs of most web developers. This is like arguing over which editor to use! And

RE: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Gary Every
The answer to that is SPEED. Nothing short of Oracle comes even close Gary Every Sr. UNIX Administrator Ingram Entertainment Inc. 2 Ingram Blvd, La Vergne, TN 37089 Pay It Forward! -Original Message- From: Lester Caine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 1:15

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Lester Caine
Gary Every wrote: The answer to that is SPEED. Nothing short of Oracle comes even close You must have a big cheque book. I get just as fast a system without having to pay a penny over the cost of the hardware ;) -- Lester Caine - L.S.Caine Electronic Services --

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Jason Wong
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 02:10, Lester Caine wrote: Gary Every wrote: The answer to that is SPEED. Nothing short of Oracle comes even close You must have a big cheque book. I get just as fast a system without having to pay a penny over the cost of the hardware ;) Hmm, if I'm not

RE: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Hutchins, Richard
be happy with our MySQL Has No Equal bumper stickers and Oracle t-shirts and move on. Now where did I leave my Tab Cola? Rich -Original Message- From: Jason Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Lester Caine
Jason Wong wrote: The answer to that is SPEED. Nothing short of Oracle comes even close You must have a big cheque book. I get just as fast a system without having to pay a penny over the cost of the hardware ;) Hmm, if I'm not mistaken, I think he means that *unless* you have a big cheque

Re: [PHP-DB] Re: LAMP

2004-08-03 Thread Lester Caine
Jason Wong wrote: The answer to that is SPEED. Nothing short of Oracle comes even close You must have a big cheque book. I get just as fast a system without having to pay a penny over the cost of the hardware ;) Hmm, if I'm not mistaken, I think he means that *unless* you have a big cheque