"Stig S. Bakken" wrote:
>
> Joao Prado Maia wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote:
> > >
> > > >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a
> > > >library ?
> > >
> > > To ea
Joao Prado Maia wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Martin Jansen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST), Joao Prado Maia wrote:
> >
> > >If PEAR::DB is not abstracting the database what is the purpose of such a
> > >library ?
> >
> > To ease the life of lot's of programmers.
> >
>
>
> I probably used a bad choice of words. What I really meant was: What is
> the objective of PEAR::DB as a database abstraction library ? To abstract
> as much as possible like Metabase already does, or to provide a unified
> API to databases and leave the implementation related to database specif
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Joao Prado Maia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Manuel Lemos wrote:
>
> > > If we fixed these problems and more, we could talk about having
> > > a unified API. Otherwise for the Oracle OCI_ASSOC, I would prefer
> > > not to change it
