Hello,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Michael Sisolak wrote:
If someone with CVS access would make the quick patches to the COM
extension described in these two bug reports for 4.2.1RC1 it would
really clean up all the Win32 codepage stuff:
#16767 - 4.2.0 broke setting the codepage when you don't
Markus Fischer wrote:
In such cases the manual has to be changed, not the code.
No problem.
I'll revert and update manual page.
Most PostgreSQL users should enable multibyte support, IMO :)
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
- Markus
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:28:41PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote :
Hi,
help is always appricaited. Without taking a closer look, is
this the only function which should be 'guarded' or are there
other within the ext/posix extensions?
- Markus
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:30:06AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
ID: 16733
Hi,
for me, I've always copied over another projects *.dsp file
and modified the related parts.
I think you're getting a faster answer why this is so if you
compare your Wizards generated file with the files within the
PHP sources ...
- Markus
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002
Hi,
people fail to understand the reason why to bloat PHP with
just another function which is really just a call to another
function (e.g. preg_*() in PHP.
As for parsing an ini file, this is certainly not true.
Anyway. There were some discussions lately to implement
is there already support for the use of unix-messages?
I wanted to try them for communication with a small daemon I wrote
but I couldn't find any information about them.
If there isn't already a module or a function for this ...
how about adding these for later versions?
Should be easy to add
Hi ppl,
$xarray=('ab', 'ba');
$xsearch=array('a', 'b');
$xreplace=array('c', 'd');
$xarray=str_replace($xsearch, $xreplace, $xarray);
str_replace used this way fails, returning $xarray unmodified. However:
$xarray=str_replace(array('a', 'b'), array('c', 'd'), $xarray);
works OK.
Any
to translate php.net into korean language
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Thomas,
I wrote such an extension a while ago, intending to commit it.
But then I got busy and forgot about it.
I'll email you a tarball; if you could try it out and give me some
feedback, I'd appreciate it.
To php-dev: Would ext/sysvmsg be a good candidate for the core,
or should it go
You should probably be using strtr() for this.
Anyway, questions about developing WITH PHP should go to the php-general
list, instead of php-dev (which is for developing PHP itself).
Regards,
Manuzhai
Izx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi ppl,
Hi,
after some digging I think I've found something, but I'm not
quite sure.
The configure shipped with php-4.2.0 is unable to properly
detect sys/un.h and therefore does NOT set HAVE_SYS_UN_H
which is the basis for unix socket support in
ext/mysql/libmysql/ .
Hi,
Anyway. There were some discussions lately to implement
something like word_count() and similar friends. Though I
don't remember what has happened, you might want to look it
up in the archive an join the discussion (It was just a week
ago or so I think).
There were
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
after some digging I think I've found something, but I'm not
quite sure.
The configure shipped with php-4.2.0 is unable to properly
detect sys/un.h and therefore does NOT set HAVE_SYS_UN_H
which is the basis for
Hi!
Am Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:15:19 +0200 schrieb Daniel Lorch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
function line_count($string) {
return count(preg_split(/\r?\n/, $string));
}
Why not simply use a substr_count($string, \n)? It works fine for me...
cu, Roland Tapken
--
Please reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.1.2 from scratch:
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking for sgtty.h... yes
checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes
checking for fcntl.h... (cached) yes
checking for float.h... yes
checking for floatingpoint.h... no
checking for ieeefp.h... (cached) no
checking for limits.h...
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
(similar if not identical with 4.1.2)
Derick, are you sure you built 4.1.2 configure with 2.52 ?!
I didn't say 4.1.2, but 4.1.0/4.1.1. I didn't build 4.1.2 afaik
Derick
Heh, ok, who did ? :-)
- Markus
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 01:59:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
(similar if not identical with 4.1.2)
Derick, are you sure you built 4.1.2 configure with 2.52 ?!
I didn't say 4.1.2, but
hi,
i have made a small patch to the session-module which allows
the script to inject some user-defined data into the
url_rewriter.
why do i need this?
- i want to be able to open a 2nd browserwindow
- this window will use the same session as the 1st one
- i
Hi,
right now the session module can only store one cookie (or
one info in trans-sid) my patch extends that to one
user-defined variable so that:
I am not quite sure whether I understood what you are trying to do,
but assumingly you have 2 frames:
+---+
|
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:41:56PM +0200, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi,
right now the session module can only store one cookie (or
one info in trans-sid) my patch extends that to one
user-defined variable so that:
I am not quite sure whether I understood what you are trying to
sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
would you mind extending it that session_set_userdata(array(thies =
1, harald = 2, knorp = 100)) would be possible ?
harald.
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hi,
i have made a small patch to the
Hi,
I am not quite sure whether I understood what you are trying to do,
but assumingly you have 2 frames:
i'm talking about 2 or more windows!
please reread.
tc
Ups, sorry. I am having the same problem, but I'm solving it by giving
every window a 'key' (like a secondary
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:14:19PM +0200, Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi,
I am not quite sure whether I understood what you are trying to do,
but assumingly you have 2 frames:
i'm talking about 2 or more windows!
please reread.
tc
Ups, sorry. I am having the same problem,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
would you mind extending it that session_set_userdata(array(thies =
1, harald = 2, knorp = 100)) would be possible ?
nope - that would make the url_scanner slower.
but you can always ancode
While were talking about session advancement... has anyone ever thought of
adding shared sesssions? Consider the following scenario:
I have 3 sets of variables:
1. Global Scoped - Variables accessed and altered by anyone entering my
site. EG: a currently online array which stores the a list
Hi,
PHP is 'dumb'. It doesn't know about a global scope, or your
logged users in or your current user. This task is up to be
implemented in user space.
- Markus
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 02:29:03PM +0100, Dan Hardiker wrote :
While were talking about session advancement...
Hi,
you may be right, but this was only a suggestion.
If you know a better way doing this, no problem.
I thought of something like __FILE__ and __LINE__,
because these constants are easy to use. If we have a function
for this, not a constant, it's also ok for me.
Michael
Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL
A short question on this:
how about __LINE__?
doesn't this also require runtime context or am i wrong?
if so, why it is a constant then, not a function?
Michael
Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
__FILE__ is compiled into
__LINE__ , __FILE__ (and now __FUNCTION__ __CLASS__) are converted at
compile time into a string - have a look at zend/zend_language_scanner.l
for more details.
regards
alan
Michael Virnstein wrote:
A short question on this:
how about __LINE__?
doesn't this also require runtime context or
Environment:
Apache 2.0.35
PHP 4.2.0RC2
FreeTDS used in place of Sybase libraries to connect to MS SQL 2000
RedHat Linux 7.1
PII 233
Problem:
Using foreach retrieves a duplicate of each database column.
Code tested:
html
head
titleTest/title
/head
body
?
$link =
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
would you mind extending it that
session_set_userdata(array(thies =
1, harald = 2, knorp = 100)) would be possible ?
nope - that would make the url_scanner slower.
but you can
This is neither a problem with PHP nor FreeTDS. From the manual:
sybase_fetch_array() is an extended version of sybase_fetch_row(). In
addition to storing the data in the numeric indices of the result array,
it also stores the data in associative indices, using the field names as
keys.
I feel like an idiot, I overlooked the *_fetch__array(). It's been a long
week...
Billy Rose
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Ricard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Rose, Billy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV]
Hi,
as i could read in the manual, the socket functions are completely
experimental.
When do you think the API gets final and won't change
anymore. Any comments on this are welcome.
Michael
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Yeah it was disscuessed that the session modules could define and handle
$_APP so that would be globals for all sessions.
a work around would be to do something like this
$oldsession_id = sessoin_id();
session_id(1);
session_start();
$var = $_SESSION['var'];
session_desetroy();
hi,
I am want to store some values to php sessions and
in another script i want to fetch data from php
session.
basically I want to store some variable values
serverside and use them in other scripts.
if is possible other way!!
how can i do it?
If any one knows then let me know.
thanks,
-
I just thought I'd post my results with doing this on a fairly bleeding edge
Slackware 8.1beta system, mainly because it has autoconf 2.53 on
it.Previously I tried running buildconf with autoconf 2.50, which didn't
generate any of the additional warnings.
Although the the 'make'ed binary
Ooops, sorry folks, jumped the gun on that one. Nope, still using TCP.
Daniel Swarbrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just thought I'd post my results with doing this on a fairly bleeding
edge
Slackware 8.1beta system, mainly because it has
Could you verify that configure script http://www.edin.dk/php/configure.gz
works on your system. Also could you please tell us the location of
mysql.sock on your system, so we can include it in the configure checks.
Edin
Daniel Swarbrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
Ooops, sorry folks, jumped the gun on that one. Nope, still using TCP.
autoconf 2.13 is the way to go
Derick
Daniel Swarbrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just thought I'd post my
Yep, just configure'd and built using that script - looks good. MySQL is
connecting with unix socket when specifying simply 'localhost' as the host
to connect to.
The MySQL socket on Slackware 8.0+ systems is in /var/run/mysql/.
Well done...
Edin Kadribasic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
At 11:11 24/04/2002 +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
My overloaded classes are now registered in MINIT with:
INIT_OVERLOADED_CLASS_ENTRY()
zend_register_internal_class()
..zend_register_list_destructors_ex
And all seems mostly fine;
except the second time apache serves a request, one of the classes
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 15:27, Brinkman, Theodore wrote:
Ok. I have the feeling that I'm going to be making myself a bit unpopular
here with my first post, but I mean no offense or disrespect. I'm just
trying to understand something.
PHP allows ?= if short tags are enabled, or %= if
As an added service for the developers without a win32 build environment I
made snapshot status and log available.
To get the latest build summary:
http://snaps.php.net/win32/snapshot.log
The complite build log:
http://snaps.php.net/win32/compile.log
Please note that the build system used is
Well, having read that thread (thank you), I tallied up the votes (where I
could tell what the vote was) and it was 13 for, 3 against, 2
undecided/don't care. Of the unsure, one person voted against, then
undecided, then for, the other voted don't care, then against. Of the
against, one voted
Hey Jani,
ext/recode no longer builds for me; this is what happens during configure:
checking for readline support... no
checking for recode support... yes
checking for recode_format_table in -lrecode... no
configure: error: I cannot link librecode (-L/usr/lib -lrecode). Is it installed?
Which recode version you have there?
--Jani
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
Hey Jani,
ext/recode no longer builds for me; this is what happens during configure:
checking for readline support... no
checking for recode support... yes
checking for recode_format_table
Hi all,
I'll change function names to confirm current naming standard
starting from standard module.
(e.g. phpversion = php_version)
There will be alias for old names.
Any comments?
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Yes, I'm blind. :)
So you have recode 3.5...just update to 3.6 and it works.
That configure error message just needs tuning.
--Jani
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Which recode version you have there?
--Jani
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Wez
Why wasnt' this change implemented? It's not a feature anyone would be
forced to use, it improves syntax consistency, and the feeling from that
discussion was overwhelmingly for the change.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell (1903-1950)
--
Hi all,
I'll change function names to confirm current naming standard
starting from standard module.
(e.g. phpversion = php_version)
There will be alias for old names.
Any comments?
yeah, don't do it! :)
we haven't decided this issue yet...
-Sterling
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
--
Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
I'll change function names to confirm current naming standard
starting from standard module.
(e.g. phpversion = php_version)
There will be alias for old names.
Any comments?
yeah, don't do it! :)
we haven't decided this issue yet...
No problem.
Are we
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Brinkman, Theodore wrote:
Well, having read that thread (thank you), I tallied up the votes (where I
could tell what the vote was) and it was 13 for, 3 against, 2
undecided/don't care. Of the unsure, one person voted against, then
undecided, then for, the other voted
53 matches
Mail list logo
