Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Removal of "php_fopen_wrapper" in HEAD will break binary modules between 4.2 and HEAD (4.3)

--- "Thies C. Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:50:01AM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote: > > Hi Thies, > > > > I did raise this issue a while back, but got no response (happens > > quite a lot on php-dev). > > I think bumping the API number would be the best course of act

[PHP-DEV] Re: Removal of "php_fopen_wrapper" in HEAD will break binary modules between 4.2 and HEAD (4.3)

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:50:01AM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote: > Hi Thies, > > I did raise this issue a while back, but got no response (happens > quite a lot on php-dev). > I think bumping the API number would be the best course of action; > a lot of things have changed (binary wise) as a result o

Re: [PHP-DEV] [NEW-EXTENSION]ext/soap : first play around ...

Acually it does behave the same way.. but it WAS by design. for my testing. I'll change it to the correcty way. It's just a default option setting. Thanks for reminding me. - Brad --- SDiZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does the extension have any problem simliar to this? > http://online.securi

[PHP-DEV] Warnings in ext/mbstring

c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbfilter.c(6382): warning C4018: '>=': Conflict between signed and unsigned c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbfilter.c(6751): warning C4018: '>=': Conflict between signed and unsigned c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbregex.c(2207): warning C4018: '>=': C

Re: [PHP-DEV] [NEW-EXTENSION]ext/soap : first play around ...

Does the extension have any problem simliar to this? http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/267051 -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: unable to pass values between pages

Hi Maria... What version of PHP are you running? If you are running 4.2.0 or newer, the problem you are seeing is by design. From version 4.2.0 onwards, request variables are no longer registered in the global scope. See http://www.php.net/release_4_2_0.php In future, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the

[PHP-DEV] unable to pass values between pages

Dear Freinds, I am trying to pass the value from one page to other. But that value is not displayed by the receiving page. I am using win 2000 server with IIS. Is there anything to be configured in php.ini file? The following is the code: user.php ---

[PHP-DEV] Build problem on Solaris 8

Hi, I tried the install list with no luck and thought perhaps someone on this list could lend some insight. Platform = Solaris 8 Shell = bash 2.05 Compiler = GCC 3.0.3 PHP version = 4.2.0 MySQL version = 3.23.45 configured with --with-mysql --with-apsx My build was failing as it ran libtool on l

[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-SOAP-DEV] [PHP-DEV] [NEW-EXTENSION]ext/soap : first play around ...

great ... it looks like using the wsdl will solve some problems ! but sometimes, specially during development, it is quite fastidious to have to write a wsdl to make the soap implementation work properly ... because SOAP has not been defined in the shadow of WSDL ... they are two independant stand

Re: [PHP-DEV] Build fails from CVS

Didn't need to do that.. after running make five times it worked (?) On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:01:59 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > just update both php4 and Zend repositories, do a make clean and it should > work again. > > Derick > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Magnus Määttä wro

Re: [PHP-DEV] Build fails from CVS

Hello, just update both php4 and Zend repositories, do a make clean and it should work again. Derick On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Magnus Määttä wrote: > Hi! > > I get this error message when i try to compile from CVS.. > > gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/include >-I/mnt/data1/St

[PHP-DEV] Build fails from CVS

Hi! I get this error message when i try to compile from CVS.. gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/include -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/main -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4 -I/usr/local/www/httpd2/include -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/Zend -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/incl

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-SOAP-DEV] [PHP-DEV] [NEW-EXTENSION]ext/soap : first play around ...

--- phpsurf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi ! > > I just started to play with your new extension as soon as I saw your mail > this morning on PHP-DEV ! > > It's really a good job and I am very impatient to play with the final > release ... > > here are a few suggestions/bugs/requests to help y

[PHP-DEV] config.w32.h

As you may know, I worked a bit on config.w32.h recently. I'd like to rename the file to config.w32.h.in and let MSVC rename config.w32.h.in to config.w32.h, if config.w32.h does not yet exist. Two questions: 1.) Is this okay? 2.) How do I do this? :-) -- Sebastian Bergmann

[PHP-DEV] Re: com Problems PHP 4.2

hi shelley, this is the wrong list for support questions. you should repost your question to php-win-help with all the required information (script, error message, ..). if you are sure that it is a bug in php and not an error in your script, then report it as a bug at http://bugs.php.net but i re

[PHP-DEV] Re: com Problems PHP 4.2

Hello Everyone, Problem 1: It seems that only one com can be executed within a PHP page. On the second Com it won't do the function lookup it gives an error message. After testing this it appears won't recognize the second Com within the PHP page. Problem 2: A by ref doesn't

[PHP-DEV] [NEW-EXTENSION]ext/soap : first play around ...

Hi ! I just started to play with your new extension as soon as I saw your mail this morning on PHP-DEV ! It's really a good job and I am very impatient to play with the final release ... here are a few suggestions/bugs/requests to help you make this ext really great : - nice to have : a proxy

Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets

On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 11:14, Steve Meyers wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 22:43, Jason Greene wrote: > > In the case of a socket you are selecting on has errored, the socket > > will show up as readable. You then can perform a socket_read/recv, and > > you should receive NULL (errored socket), then

Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets

On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 22:43, Jason Greene wrote: > In the case of a socket you are selecting on has errored, the socket > will show up as readable. You then can perform a socket_read/recv, and > you should receive NULL (errored socket), then you can call > socket_last_error to receive the errno. >

Re: [PHP-DEV] socket_create() doesn't expose error if one occurs[CVS HEAD]

The patch looks good to me, go ahead and apply it. Thanks, -Jason On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 04:02, Markus Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > attached is the patch I intend to commit later this day: > > - Stores last errno in a module global implicitely > - Sets global last error explicitel

[PHP-DEV] [Suggestion] Web server line in bug reporting form

I think we should add a dedicated line for the web server type in the bug reporting form. That will cut down on the number of what "webserver are you running" questions as well as the number of bad assumptions. This should also go into the e-mails sent to the php-bugs list. If this has been sug

RE: [PHP-DEV]

Not trying to impress anybody with anything. Just stating the simple fact that some people (myself included) find '' easier to read than ''. I don't find it particularly 'cryptic'. - Theo -Original Message- From: Chris Shiflett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26,

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sysvmsg sysvmsg.c /ext/sysvmsg/tests 001.phpt

Is there a better way of acheiving this? I want the unserialized data to be passed back as an out parameter, but if I pass the actual out_message var to php_var_unserialize I get segfaults or overruns. --Wez. > if (do_unserialize) { > php_unserialize_data_

Re: [PHP-DEV] bugs: try newer version (?)

Addressed to: "fabwash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** Reply to note from "fabwash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 29 Apr 2002 06:56:47 -0400 > > I can't get them to upgrade my server to 4.1.2 because I share my box > with 255 other > websites and they won't upgrade until t

[PHP-DEV] Re: snaps.php.net

"Christoph Grottolo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I hope not to insult with that question, but win32 binaries of the snapshots > of the stable branch would also be very helpful.. Will be available later today or tomorrow. Edin -- PHP Dev

[PHP-DEV] Re: snaps.php.net

"Jim Winstead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Marko Karppinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Even though no sane person can dispute the fact that the frantic > > pace of PHP3 development warrants fresh snapshot of the venerable > > script

Re: [PHP-DEV] bugs: try newer version (?)

If an ISP hosts about 30 websites, that's about 500 to 1200 Linux boxes, so they upgrade in batch and it's better work. I can't get them to upgrade my server to 4.1.2 because I share my box with 255 other websites and they won't upgrade until the next scheduled batch unless it's an emergency.

Re: [PHP-DEV] socket_create() doesn't expose error if one occurs [CVS HEAD]

Hi, attached is the patch I intend to commit later this day: - Stores last errno in a module global implicitely - Sets global last error explicitely for socket_select() and socket_create() - Modified socket_last_error() to return global modules last error if no so

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] RFC: documenting Object aggregation functions

On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote: > I am documenting the new object aggregation functions, > and before I add it to the CVS tree, I would like to > ask some questions: I would wait with documenting this until all discussions are done on it. regards, Derick > > 1) I am using en/

[PHP-DEV] Session module expansion [comments please]

I previously wrote (and fear it got lost in the storm of debate over Your work around is how Im doing things at the moment (very annoying > picking up and dropping sessions). PHP's limitation currently is that > it can only handle one session at a time, and as thus, only one set of > session vari

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #16333 Updated: mail() is not supported in this PHP build

Hi, I just want to add that I asked this myself too in the past. And since the sendmail path can be configured in PHP.INI it's doubtful what the gain of the check for the sendmail binary wins us. - Markus On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:54:21PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote : >

Re: [PHP-DEV] specifying smtp server on win32 via 5th mail() parameter

Jim Winstead wrote: > as suggested at http://bugs.php.net/10629, the patch below would allow > win32 users to specify the smtp server to use as the 5th parameter to > the mail() function. (the 'pass random options to my sendmail program' > parameter on unix systems.) > > any thoughts? (maybe it's