On 10/17/02, Moriyoshi Koizumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, as far as I read the archives, I haven't found any discussions on the
charset related backwards problems. So I wrote *exactly* about this
issue.
Search for htmlentities charset. Both myself and thies (and probably others
were
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:41:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Andi.
yeah, I will wait for Thies to reply to me. We have sort of a started
this discussion with him before, so hopefully he will join into this one.
My main concerns about OCI8 are the followings ones. Some of
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:40:01AM +0900, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
Sebastian Nohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5. Functions are called OCI .* I do well know what it refers to, but
this is only because I learned the original oci.h API. Wouldn't itbe more
standard for PHP to use similar naming as
Hi,
At 03:05 17-10-2002, Alex Black wrote:
[...]
Still no one has told me what's happening with the XML extension! :) That's
all I wanted to know...
Are you looking for Xerces support or for a validating XML parser?
libxml is validating XML parser and is supported through the domxml
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:22:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure glad this in the headlines again ;-)
As Thies knows, I already proposed another important change,
which is supporting multiple character sets. This is very
important on shared web platforms, and I have experienced
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:24:24AM +0200, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
any OCIParse and set the charset. This would be:
1. more flexible
2. would exclude non-authentication functionality with OCILogon
3. easier to find for a user
adding the charset to the logon call is how the others do
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 03:15:36PM +0200, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 16.10.02 14:27:35:
I think, at this point, it is up to Thies to review the patch.
I hope he's not too harsh on it ;-), since this code is certainly
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:26:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and just to be clear about it: I am absolutely positive on
a completely new (perhaps unified) extension for PHP 5, and
would gladly participate.
hmm, sure - why not. we could start to brainstoorm about that
and
I would have no problem - as a user - with the removal of short_tags IF
?php=$var? was allowed!! Because the ?= short cut is the only reason
I use ? at all!
Just to add fuel to the fire ;-)
Mike
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
At 04:29 17/10/2002, .: B i g D o g :. wrote:
IMHO, i think that short tags should be taken out of php and just use
the ?php to start the parser.
Not going to happen, please leave this issue alone.
Zeev
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
We should have warned people not to use short tags years ago.
We can try it from now. Until we get rid of short tag or
disable it by default, we suggest users to work around
problem.
I really think that whoever adds XML to their applications, will be
aware of the fact that short open tag
At 05:11 17/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Ilia A. wrote:
Isn't BIG caution for short_open_tag=Off while having short_open_tag=On
enough for now? Something like;
Nope, please consider a hosting enviroment where an average user does not
even have access to the php.ini file. In fact, most ISP won't
Zeev Suraski wrote:
No, we shouldn't have. It is not a deprecated feature or a discouraged
feature. If you use the *FAIRLY RARE* combination of using PHP to
generate XML, you'd have to configure your PHP. If you're with the vast
majority of the population and couldn't care less about
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:41:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Andi.
yeah, I will wait for Thies to reply to me. We have sort of a started
this discussion with him before, so hopefully he will join into this one.
My
At 11:10 17/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
No, we shouldn't have. It is not a deprecated feature or a discouraged
feature. If you use the *FAIRLY RARE* combination of using PHP to
generate XML, you'd have to configure your PHP. If you're with the vast
majority of the
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
the ora_ extension uses the pre oracle8 api. if you need to
compile with oracle7 libraries you have to use the ora_*()
functions.
OK, but isn't it a bit confusing? can't all PHP's Oracle functionality
depend on the same functionset
Wez Furlong wrote:
Search for htmlentities charset. Both myself and thies (and probably others
were discussing this).
In short: there are many, many, many people who have scripts that rely
on htmlentities defaulting to iso-8859-1 (the documented default for ever).
With the patch, ISO 8859-1
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:24:24AM +0200, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
any OCIParse and set the charset. This would be:
1. more flexible
2. would exclude non-authentication functionality with OCILogon
3. easier to find for a user
As part of my new site I have created a php-driven guestbook. The guestbook
entries are stored in a file called guestbook.txt.
I found that in order to get the script to write to the file, I had to set
the directory permissions for the guestbook directory and the guestbook.txt
file to
Gwydion Elderwyn wrote:
As part of my new site I have created a php-driven guestbook. The guestbook
entries are stored in a file called guestbook.txt.
I found that in order to get the script to write to the file, I had to set
the directory permissions for the guestbook directory and the
Mike Hall wrote:
I would have no problem - as a user - with the removal of short_tags IF
?php=$var? was allowed!! Because the ?= short cut is the only reason
I use ? at all!
Just to add fuel to the fire ;-)
I know that.
You know that
Most of know that it's just another fuel ;)
--
Yasuo
-Original Message-
From: Yasuo Ohgaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 October 2002 06:16
[snip]
Even if we never change the default,
?php echo ?xml ..?;? works always w/o patch.
[snip]
We may even have XML processor that processes PHP code in XML
documents in the
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Hope to see someone to anser, commenting my thoughts on this. I am very
much willing contributing to the PHP's Oracle support development.
that always appreciated. wher do you want to start?
tc
Thies, what do you thik of adding
just a few thoughts.
the OCIQuery that maxim proposed has the advantage of being pretty high-level, making
it much easier for mysql programmers to get a grip at oracle, but then again i think
that every self-respecting php developer would write a function/method that does this
for him ;-).
At 11:31 17.10.2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Wez Furlong wrote:
Search for htmlentities charset. Both myself and thies (and probably
others
were discussing this).
In short: there are many, many, many people who have scripts that rely
on htmlentities defaulting to iso-8859-1 (the documented default
Why did you remove the charset info?
I want my charset back since it enables correct handling of the output.
Everything these lines commented out by you do is telling the receiver
what charset he gets. That is compareable to http charset info which
will be generated by those modules also. This
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
This is one of the reason why I think we should try to change
short_open_tag default. ? is reserved for XML PI (Processing
Instruction). There may be many (and/or custom) PI tags and it
may become more serious problem in the future.
We may even have
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 04:09 AM, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
you mean renaming the oci8 extension - could be done... but i
personally see no pressing reason for doing so.
Any chance we can rename the configure option from --with-oci8 to just
--with-oci? Since it does work
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
i don't really think it's a needed function as it won't
support binding of variables and setting the execute mode.
I just noticed that MSSQL has also a very similar case. You have
mssql_query() for the queries and mssql_init(),
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I. Am. So. Tired. Of. Seeing. This. Come. Up. Over. And. Over. Again.
The next time someone mentions this on the list, I'm grabbing a LART[1] and
heading over to their house.
So we're not going to turn it off by default?
Derick
--
30 matches
Mail list logo
