--- Christian Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
> > dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
> > the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
> > to begin with. Instead o
Hi
> Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
> dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
> the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
> to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child..
'cause appendCh
Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child..
- We started conforming to
--- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
> this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
Understood ;)
> Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard?
> anyway
Again, I'm no
Hi,
I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like
what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the
api have it easier' or did I miss something else?
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
> --- brad lafountain <[EM
--- brad lafountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
> so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
That would fit the bill nicely.
Brent
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
h
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
- Brad
--- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
> this was discussed so you can search the archives for i
Hi,
btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard?
anyway
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
> -
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
> --- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
> > to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
> > afaik).
>
> I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I d
--- Markus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
> to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
> afaik).
I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it
is up to PHP developers to change publi
Hi,
not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
afaik).
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:49:50PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
> I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
> under
Hello,
can you file a change/feature request for this @ bugs.php.net ?
Derick
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
> I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
> underscore-based convention:
>
> i.e.
> $mynode->append_child($achild);
>
> I am no language lawyer but i
I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
underscore-based convention:
i.e.
$mynode->append_child($achild);
I am no language lawyer but if you read the DOM Core documentation
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html) it suggests a
case-based (no underscore) convention:
13 matches
Mail list logo
