RE: [PHP-DEV] ImageMagick module for PHP

It probably should go in, but it is doing ok as a standalone extension. It builds easily and the author can maintain his own release schedule. -Rasmus On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Robinson wrote: > > Rasmus Lerdorf writes: > > > Because it didn't work, and the ImageMagick library is absolutely > >

RE: [PHP-DEV] ImageMagick module for PHP

Rasmus Lerdorf writes: > Because it didn't work, and the ImageMagick library is absolutely > horrible. Have a look at the Imlib2 extension. > > -Rasmus I surprised imlib2 hasn't made it into the php source. It is quite nice. Perhaps its time it graduated. :) .mike > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, [

Re: [PHP-DEV] ImageMagick module for PHP

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Because it didn't work, and the ImageMagick library is absolutely > horrible. Unlike what software? :-) > Have a look at the Imlib2 extension. That's even better. Thanks! -- Ragnar Kjørstad Zet.no -- PHP Development Mailing

Re: [PHP-DEV] ImageMagick module for PHP

Because it didn't work, and the ImageMagick library is absolutely horrible. Have a look at the Imlib2 extension. -Rasmus On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-1] Ragnar Kjørstad wrote: > Hi > > I see there is a Image Magick module for php3 but not php4. > Why was it removed? > > Is there any work in

[PHP-DEV] ImageMagick module for PHP

Hi I see there is a Image Magick module for php3 but not php4. Why was it removed? Is there any work in progress for reimplementing it? (we need it badly, and will considder joining the development) -- Ragnar Kjørstad Zet.no -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubsc