> > can you explain me why this affects the url_scanner ?
>
> i'm a liar;-)
i know ;)
>
> no, if architected smart it would make no real difference.
> but - do we really want it? session-data belongs into the
> session. this new function just allows you to identify
> differ
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 06:59:21PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
> > > sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
> > >
> > > would you mind extending it that
> > session_set_userdata(array("thies" =>
> > > "1", "harald" => "2", "knorp" => "100"
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
> > sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
> >
> > would you mind extending it that
> session_set_userdata(array("thies" =>
> > "1", "harald" => "2", "knorp" => "100")) would be possible ?
>
> nope - that would make the url_scanner sl
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Harald Radi wrote:
> sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
>
> would you mind extending it that session_set_userdata(array("thies" =>
> "1", "harald" => "2", "knorp" => "100")) would be possible ?
nope - that would make the url_scanner slower.
but you
sounds very useful, go ahead ;)
would you mind extending it that session_set_userdata(array("thies" =>
"1", "harald" => "2", "knorp" => "100")) would be possible ?
harald.
"Thies C. Arntzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
> hi,
>
> i have made
