Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows Threads

2002-11-21 Thread Shane Caraveo
Nick Loman wrote: Well, that's cool then! Why not simply include all this stuff with PHP rather than supporting the flawed ISAPI that it currently is packaged with? 4.3 the windows cgi binary is compiled with fastcgi support. I'm going to be testing the fastcgi on osx this week once I get thi

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows Threads

2002-11-21 Thread Nick Loman
Well, that's cool then! Why not simply include all this stuff with PHP rather than supporting the flawed ISAPI that it currently is packaged with? On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Shane Caraveo wrote: > John Coggeshall wrote: > > > Shane (and everyone else): > > > > > > > > >Why don't we move PHP into a s

[PHP-DEV] Re: Windows Threads

2002-11-21 Thread Shane Caraveo
John Coggeshall wrote: Shane (and everyone else): >Why don't we move PHP into a separate executable. Design a >"thin" ISAPI DLL which purely passes the data which the ISAPI >DLL exposes between the IIS process and the PHP process (or >process-pool for added reliability). The resulting page is