OK, for those who actually commented, there seems to be a
consensus. Glad I asked. :)
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote the following to Paul Marquis,...:
> > I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and
> > is consistent with the libxml2 docs.
>
> Plus, it is th
> I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and
> is consistent with the libxml2 docs.
Plus, it is then similar to other PHP functions that use an "object" or
"handle"
as the first argument (e.g. mysql_, fopen, fwrite, curl, etc.).
- Colin
--
PHP Development Mailing Lis
I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and
is consistent with the libxml2 docs.
On Thursday 19 July 2001 07:44, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Hi Joey,
>
> Good to see some work going on with DOMXML =).
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote:
> > I think it is a good idea to
Hi Joey,
Good to see some work going on with DOMXML =).
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to keep both the "procedural"
> and "object oriented" interfaces in the code.
This should be kept, at least up until a new major PHP release occurs.
> Style #1:
> The dom
There needs to be a decision made in order to complete
the work on domxml, as it currently stands.
I think it is a good idea to keep both the "procedural"
and "object oriented" interfaces in the code.
The way the module is currently written, it will take
the least amount of work to just require
