On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> For the record, I reported a similar problem on win32 a while ago, though it
> was with date('r') (rfc822 date), but showed the same thing - wrong sign for
> the timezone offset.
Fixed.
-Andrei
"Music expresses that which can not be said
and on w
Quoting Jim Winstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i didn't check how date('Z') is defined (do you add it to local time to get
> UTC or subtract it?) but it may be that systems where struct tm has a
> tm_gmtoff member and systems that use the timezone global may
> define it different ways.
>
> they sho
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:58:14PM -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> > i didn't check how date('Z') is defined (do you add it to local time to get
> > UTC or subtract it?) but it may be that systems where struct tm has a
> > tm_gmtoff member and systems tha
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jim Winstead wrote:
> i didn't check how date('Z') is defined (do you add it to local time to get
> UTC or subtract it?) but it may be that systems where struct tm has a
> tm_gmtoff member and systems that use the timezone global may
> define it different ways.
Well, I am in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right now date('Z') returns timezone offset with different signs on
> Linux and Solaris. For my timezone I get -21600 on Linux and 21600 on
> Solaris. What would be a good way to fix it so that it's consistent?
i didn't check how date('Z
Hi,
Right now date('Z') returns timezone offset with different signs on
Linux and Solaris. For my timezone I get -21600 on Linux and 21600 on
Solaris. What would be a good way to fix it so that it's consistent?
-Andrei
* We reason deeply, when we forcibly feel. *
--
PHP Development Mailing Lis
