[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi,
About the language specification project:
The goal I see for this project is coming out with a document that is
useful for users. Something that they could hold in their hands, and from
reading it, they'd know whether something is supposed to work or not. Now,
At 15:58 21/5/2001, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
I think the important thing is just to have the language specified and
thoroughly documented, with BNF and all. Let quirks be quriks for
now, a specification process should not fix them, but put them all on
the radar for future fixing. There's
huge snip
Stig wrote:
I think the important thing is just to have the language specified and
thoroughly documented, with BNF and all. Let quirks be quriks for
now, a specification process should not fix them, but put them all on
the radar for future fixing. There's always someone who
Hi,
About the language specification project:
The goal I see for this project is coming out with a document that is
useful for users. Something that they could hold in their hands, and from
reading it, they'd know whether something is supposed to work or not. Now,
I'm sure that it's possible
Hi,
About the language specification project:
The goal I see for this project is coming out with a document that is
useful for users. Something that they could hold in their hands, and from
reading it, they'd know whether something is supposed to work or not. Now,
I'm sure that it's possible
On Sun, 20 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This project seems rather dead to me. Though, I think it should be
continued. Some work was alread been done.
Yeah, it should be very nice to have a spec, so that others can implement
an alternative for the Zend engine (/me hides)
I would like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Sun, 20 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This project seems rather dead to me. Though, I think it should be
continued. Some work was alread been done.
Yeah, it should be very nice to have a spec, so that
