Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-22 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 15:04 21/2/2001, André Langhorst wrote: >>That's what I recalled too. I don't think that this can work today, so >>if this check got lost along the way, it should probably be restored. > >hehe, the PHP Mime type check is still there, but why do we shut down all >buffers? >what did it intenti

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-21 Thread php4
Addressed to: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Langhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PHP Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** Reply to note from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Langhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:04:40 +0100 > > > That's what I recalled too. I don't think that this can wo

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-21 Thread André Langhorst
> That's what I recalled too. I don't think that this can work today, so > if this check got lost along the way, it should probably be restored. hehe, the PHP Mime type check is still there, but why do we shut down all buffers? what did it intentionally fix? I still do not get it... andré --

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-20 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 00:35 21/2/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >Ah right. I vaguely remember writing a check for this years ago. That's what I recalled too. I don't think that this can work today, so if this check got lost along the way, it should probably be restored. Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> At 00:18 21/2/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > Hrm, it *is* intentional. But we may need to do something smarter here. > > > One thing that I don't understand - one can't really call virtual() on > > > another PHP file, can she? > > > >Why not? virtual() just kicks off an Apache sub-request.

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-20 Thread Zeev Suraski
At 00:18 21/2/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > Hrm, it *is* intentional. But we may need to do something smarter here. > > One thing that I don't understand - one can't really call virtual() on > > another PHP file, can she? > >Why not? virtual() just kicks off an Apache sub-request. That >sub-r

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-20 Thread Rasmus Lerdorf
> Hrm, it *is* intentional. But we may need to do something smarter here. > One thing that I don't understand - one can't really call virtual() on > another PHP file, can she? Why not? virtual() just kicks off an Apache sub-request. That sub-rerquest can be any valid Apache request. -Rasmus

Re: [PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-20 Thread Zeev Suraski
Hrm, it *is* intentional. But we may need to do something smarter here. One thing that I don't understand - one can't really call virtual() on another PHP file, can she? Zeev At 17:18 19/2/2001, André Langhorst wrote: >I tried (and failed) to figure out why virtual() closes any output buffers,

[PHP-DEV] php_apache.c virtual() enlightment needed

2001-02-19 Thread André Langhorst
I tried (and failed) to figure out why virtual() closes any output buffers, I think this is not very gentle, could anybody enlighten me? andré -- · André Langhorstt: +49 331 5811560 · · [EMAIL PROTECTED] m: +49 173 9558736 · * PHP Quality Assurance http://qa.php.net * ID: