At 07:12 8/3/2001, André Langhorst wrote:
>b)
>I think I am still getting something wrong... ticks are _not_ for
>simulating "background processing" (once said on the list), because
>nothing gets forked there and there is no concurrency at no point
>(unfortunately!), they are simply a way to im
a)
This code crashes with current releases on phpapache+win32 (not cgi),
linux untested...
b)
I think I am still getting something wrong... ticks are _not_ for
simulating "background processing" (once said on the list), because
nothing gets forked there and there is no concurrency at no poin
