Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> At 14:28 9-7-2002, Jani Taskinen shared with all of us:
>
>
>
>> Did you notice ext/sysvsem/sysvsem.c line 45 having
>> the HAVE_SEMUN defined even if it's not?
>
>
> Now I did :-0
>
> However - I don't have access to a system that has semctl with 3 arguments.
At 14:28 9-7-2002, Jani Taskinen shared with all of us:
> Did you notice ext/sysvsem/sysvsem.c line 45 having
> the HAVE_SEMUN defined even if it's not?
Now I did :-0
However - I don't have access to a system that has semctl with 3 arguments.
Anyone?
>
> If it's not found, it wi
Did you notice ext/sysvsem/sysvsem.c line 45 having
the HAVE_SEMUN defined even if it's not?
If it's not found, it will always be set anyway..
--Jani
--
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
>Hi,
>
>attached is a patch that checks wether sem_ctl accep
Hi,
sounds sane, I'd say "commit it" :)
Derick
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a patch that checks wether sem_ctl accepts a pointer as an
> argument. It doesn't do that, on BSD/OS (maybe others?) systems.
> Patch works on BSD/OS 4.x, and verified on BSD/OS 4.2
