> So what does that mean? The code is OK there and it isn't reached on
> systems where readdir_r returns 0 for success? I'm not quite sure what to
> do with this bug report.
We either need to differentiate between Solaris and HPUX
readdir_r or ignore the return value of that system call,
At 12:34 PM 4/27/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> > Larry,
> > You are right if this code refers to the POSIX semantics of readdir_r.
> > However, this code is in #if defined(HAVE_OLD_READDIR_R) and I don't know
> > what is meant by old readdir_r (di
Larry,
You are right if this code refers to the POSIX semantics of readdir_r.
However, this code is in #if defined(HAVE_OLD_READDIR_R) and I don't know
what is meant by old readdir_r (different semantics?).
Sascha? Can you shed some light on this?
Andi
At 06:23 AM 4/27/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTEC
