Jim Winstead wrote:
as suggested at http://bugs.php.net/10629, the patch below would allow
win32 users to specify the smtp server to use as the 5th parameter to
the mail() function. (the 'pass random options to my sendmail program'
parameter on unix systems.)
any thoughts? (maybe it's
Hi,
I just want to add that I asked this myself too in the past.
And since the sendmail path can be configured in PHP.INI it's
doubtful what the gain of the check for the sendmail binary
wins us.
- Markus
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:54:21PM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote :
I previously wrote (and fear it got lost in the storm of debate over ?, %
=, and ?php=), hoping to get some feedback as to any modifications /
comments on my suggestions... and assuming that people view my ideas as
promising, how to go about implementing them.
--
Dan Hardiker [[EMAIL
Hi,
attached is the patch I intend to commit later this day:
- Stores last errno in a module global implicitely
- Sets global last error explicitely for socket_select() and
socket_create()
- Modified socket_last_error() to return global modules last
error if no
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote:
I am documenting the new object aggregation functions,
and before I add it to the CVS tree, I would like to
ask some questions:
I would wait with documenting this until all discussions are done on it.
regards,
Derick
1) I am using
If an ISP hosts about 30 websites, that's about 500 to 1200 Linux boxes,
so they upgrade in batch and it's better work. I can't get them to upgrade
my server to 4.1.2 because I share my box with 255 other websites and they
won't upgrade until the next scheduled batch unless it's an emergency.
Jim Winstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Marko Karppinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even though no sane person can dispute the fact that the frantic
pace of PHP3 development warrants fresh snapshot of the venerable
scripting
Christoph Grottolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I hope not to insult with that question, but win32 binaries of the
snapshots
of the stable branch would also be very helpful..
Will be available later today or tomorrow.
Edin
--
PHP
Is there a better way of acheiving this?
I want the unserialized data to be passed back as an out parameter, but
if I pass the actual out_message var to php_var_unserialize I get segfaults
or overruns.
--Wez.
if (do_unserialize) {
php_unserialize_data_t
Not trying to impress anybody with anything. Just stating the simple fact
that some people (myself included) find '?php= $var ?' easier to read than
'?php echo $var ?'. I don't find it particularly 'cryptic'.
- Theo
-Original Message-
From: Chris Shiflett [mailto:[EMAIL
I think we should add a dedicated line for the web server type in the bug
reporting form. That will cut down on the number of what webserver are you
running questions as well as the number of bad assumptions. This should
also go into the e-mails sent to the php-bugs list. If this has been
The patch looks good to me, go ahead and apply it.
Thanks,
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 04:02, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
attached is the patch I intend to commit later this day:
- Stores last errno in a module global implicitely
- Sets global last error explicitely for
On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 22:43, Jason Greene wrote:
In the case of a socket you are selecting on has errored, the socket
will show up as readable. You then can perform a socket_read/recv, and
you should receive NULL (errored socket), then you can call
socket_last_error to receive the errno.
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 11:14, Steve Meyers wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 22:43, Jason Greene wrote:
In the case of a socket you are selecting on has errored, the socket
will show up as readable. You then can perform a socket_read/recv, and
you should receive NULL (errored socket), then you
Hi !
I just started to play with your new extension as soon as I saw your mail
this morning on PHP-DEV !
It's really a good job and I am very impatient to play with the final
release ...
here are a few suggestions/bugs/requests to help you make this ext really
great :
- nice to have : a proxy
Hello Everyone,
Problem 1:
It seems that only one com can be executed within a PHP page. On the
second Com it won't do the function lookup it gives an error message. After
testing this it appears won't recognize the second Com within the PHP page.
Problem 2:
A by ref doesn't
hi shelley,
this is the wrong list for support questions. you should repost your
question to php-win-help with all the required information (script,
error message, ..). if you are sure that it is a bug in php and not an
error in your script, then report it as a bug at http://bugs.php.net but
i
As you may know, I worked a bit on config.w32.h recently.
I'd like to rename the file to config.w32.h.in and let MSVC rename
config.w32.h.in to config.w32.h, if config.w32.h does not yet exist.
Two questions:
1.) Is this okay?
2.) How do I do this? :-)
--
Sebastian
--- phpsurf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
I just started to play with your new extension as soon as I saw your mail
this morning on PHP-DEV !
It's really a good job and I am very impatient to play with the final
release ...
here are a few suggestions/bugs/requests to help you make
Hi!
I get this error message when i try to compile from CVS..
gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/include
-I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/main -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4
-I/usr/local/www/httpd2/include -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/Zend
-I/usr/include/libxml2
Hello,
just update both php4 and Zend repositories, do a make clean and it should
work again.
Derick
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Magnus Määttä wrote:
Hi!
I get this error message when i try to compile from CVS..
gcc -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/mnt/data1/Stuff/CVS/PHP/php4/include
Didn't need to do that.. after running make five times it worked (?)
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:01:59 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
just update both php4 and Zend repositories, do a make clean and it should
work again.
Derick
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Magnus Määttä wrote:
great ...
it looks like using the wsdl will solve some problems !
but sometimes, specially during development, it is quite fastidious to have
to write a wsdl to make the soap implementation work properly ... because
SOAP has not been defined in the shadow of WSDL ... they are two independant
Hi,
I tried the install list with no luck and thought perhaps someone on this
list could lend some insight.
Platform = Solaris 8
Shell = bash 2.05
Compiler = GCC 3.0.3
PHP version = 4.2.0
MySQL version = 3.23.45
configured with --with-mysql --with-apsx
My build was failing as it ran libtool on
Dear Freinds,
I am trying to pass the value from one page to other. But that value is not
displayed by the receiving page.
I am using win 2000 server with IIS. Is there anything to be configured in
php.ini file?
The following is the code:
user.php
HTML
FORM METHOD=POST ACTION=process.php
INPUT
Hi Maria...
What version of PHP are you running? If you are running 4.2.0 or newer, the
problem you are seeing is by design. From version 4.2.0 onwards, request
variables are no longer registered in the global scope.
See http://www.php.net/release_4_2_0.php
In future, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the
Does the extension have any problem simliar to this?
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/267051
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbfilter.c(6382): warning C4018: '=':
Conflict between signed and unsigned
c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbfilter.c(6751): warning C4018: '=':
Conflict between signed and unsigned
c:\home\php\php4\ext\mbstring\mbregex.c(2207): warning C4018: '=':
Acually it does behave the same way.. but it WAS by design. for my testing.
I'll change it to the correcty way. It's just a default option setting.
Thanks for reminding me.
- Brad
--- SDiZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the extension have any problem simliar to this?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:50:01AM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
Hi Thies,
I did raise this issue a while back, but got no response (happens
quite a lot on php-dev).
I think bumping the API number would be the best course of action;
a lot of things have changed (binary wise) as a result of
30 matches
Mail list logo
