Okay that's more like it, emalloc on top. That's what I would expect in
the first place. And I guess Zeev is right that it doesn't really tell
you anything expect from that PHP does its share of alloc/free, and then
some.
- Stig
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 23:06, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Well,
Hello,
PHP 4.2.1 is released today, it's a bug fix release which addresses some
serious bugs (and a lot of other little bugs) in 4.2.0. The full release
announcement follows below:
This bug fix release solves a few bugs found in PHP 4.2.0. PHP 4.2.1
includes the following fixes:
Hi,
seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same
problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php does the trick
and runs the test suite properly.
- Markus
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +, Wez Furlong wrote :
Damn - sapi/cgi is being run and the http
Hi,
I am a newcomer to PHP so I apologise in advance if my question seems
trivial or has already been answered on this site before.
I have been tasked with creating an HTML based interface for one of our
products. We already have a mature API set used to configure the product in
the form of a
Simon Fogg wrote:
Hi,
I am a newcomer to PHP so I apologise in advance if my question seems
trivial or has already been answered on this site before.
I have been tasked with creating an HTML based interface for one of our
products. We already have a mature API set used to configure the
Btw, now (in HEAD) you can run pear run-tests in any directory with
tests in it. No need for a makefile.
- Stig
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 13:05, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
seems nothing happened there yet. CVS HEAD has the same
problem. Just deleting the CGI in ~/php4/php does the
Thanks Martin, I will have a look.
One other question is to do with the Mac OSX platform. I noticed that
extension modules are compiled down to dll's - what form do they take on the
Mac platform, or can they even be created? I seem to remember reading that
these modules can be created for UNIX
zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold
a null terminating character, but rather directly store the
length of the string - I note this because of how the
ZVAL_STRING macro works... My question then is what is the
best way to compare two strings in a zval? I would imagine
a
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the
length stored.
But zend does provied this api function
zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*);
- Brad
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zval containers that are of string type don't seem to hold
a
brad lafountain wrote:
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the
length stored.
You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you
wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because
the null bytes everywhere would
brad lafountain wrote:
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the
length stored.
But zend does provied this api function
zend_binary_zval_strcmp(zval *, zval*);
Oh and I almost forgot... THANKS... this appears to be exactly
what I was looking for :)
zval strings must be NULL terminated, even if they contain binary
data. The str.val.len property represents the length of the string w/o the
terminating NULL.
Zeev
At 16:39 14/05/2002, Robert Cummings wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null
Robert Cummings wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have the
length stored.
You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you
wouldn't be able to store compressed data from gzip in a string because
the
I believe you hijacked my thread - The original subject was: 'Creating
extension module for PHP'!
Brad Lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have
the
length stored.
But
Simon Fogg wrote:
I believe you hijacked my thread - The original subject was: 'Creating
extension module for PHP'!
I was asking about specific information about specific functionality,
your thread asks about how to write an extension... I already know how
and have done so, I'd just like to
Diff against current HEAD for patch for bug #14407. This allows the
return path to automatically be set to the from address for Win32
sendmail.
Michael Sisolak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
That's o.k.- I'm just grouchy. There seems to be so much information to wade
through to find out what you need to know.
Since we are on the subject though, and you have already done this sort of
thing before, can you tell me whether extensions are supported on MacOSX. My
Mac colleague is off
Hi,
This changes I did fix a nasty crash when using 'Cc' in the
header parameter to mail() when not being terminated with
\r\n. Despite the win32 sendmail code being buggy as hell,
I'ld like some feedback of testers (ok, I'm not sure if I
really want this :-), anyway
Simon Fogg wrote:
That's o.k.- I'm just grouchy. There seems to be so much information to wade
through to find out what you need to know.
Since we are on the subject though, and you have already done this sort of
thing before, can you tell me whether extensions are supported on MacOSX. My
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
Well i do believe that the zval string SHOULD be null termiated and have
the
length stored.
You would think so, but on further thought, if that were the case you
wouldn't be able to
Hi,
Some functions added in interbase module raise compiler error.
these functions require IB 6 or later cause they work together with the new
IB6 API.
It seems as in the code there is no control on the IB version installed,
and the compiler is always looking for new Api .
People who are
Hi,
thanks for your quick repsonse. I've applied your patch with
a few changes.
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:27:39AM -0700, Michael Sisolak wrote :
Diff against current HEAD for patch for bug #14407. This allows the
return path to automatically be set to the from
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Daniela Mariaschi wrote:
Hi,
Some functions added in interbase module raise compiler error.
these functions require IB 6 or later cause they work together with the new
IB6 API.
It seems as in the code there is no control on the IB version installed,
and the
Attached is a patch that exposes zend_execute_data in the executor globals, this
data is useful for lowerlevel access to the Zend scripting engine, especially when
accessing data directly out of the OP structures.
-Sterling
Index: zend_execute.c
What's the current status of OS X support? I understand that 4.3 will be the
first release to officially support OS X but how much of the work is
complete in current CVS?
I grabbed the latest yesterday and compiled it -- still had my issues
creating files and directories (Where I would get
hey,
i've come across a bug these past few days in regexps, i've been getting mad about
this. I looked around in the Bug Database and i found it :
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=11461
it's from 4.0.6, dated almost a year and still hasn't been corrected and is not even
assigned
Any ideas why
It's not a bug. The regex is simply wrong. The ereg() functions are
POSIX 1003.2 compliant. Read this:
A bracket expression is a list of characters enclosed in
`[]'. It normally matches any single character from the
list (but see below). If the list begins with
On Tue, 14 May 2002 09:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok thanks. I wasn't sure of myself and since the bug wasn't closed i thought that
maybe it had slipped your QA Team. You should close it at least so that people don't
get confused on it.
Thanks a lot.
It's not
Hello Mitch!
What's the current status of OS X support? I understand that 4.3 will be the
first release to officially support OS X but how much of the work is
complete in current CVS?
PHP 4.3 has had a large number of strides made towards Darwin support.
Marko was able to get things like the
Hello,
these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers
on your system I think.
Derick
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Richard Archer wrote:
Aah, but by the same logic, if Apache 2.0 with PHP4 can provide the
users with a
On Tue, 14 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers
on your system I think.
Hmm, that's strange, in fact in my mcrypt.h there are no such definitions,
but it's the RPM from Mdk (maybe it's broken).
Thanks.
--
PHP
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
these versions of libmcrypt should work fine, you have some stray headers
on your system I think.
Hmm, that's strange, in fact in my mcrypt.h there are no such definitions,
but it's the RPM from
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
PHP being a web server scripting language is a unique case, for example
consider that once apache 2.0 becomes stable, safe_mode will become
obsolete, on the other hand the situation described here will become
quite deadly if some sort of threaded mode is used. So FD
I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
underscore-based convention:
i.e.
$mynode-append_child($achild);
I am no language lawyer but if you read the DOM Core documentation
(http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Core/core.html) it suggests a
case-based (no underscore) convention:
Hello,
can you file a change/feature request for this @ bugs.php.net ?
Derick
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
underscore-based convention:
i.e.
$mynode-append_child($achild);
I am no language lawyer but if you
Hi,
not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
afaik).
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:49:50PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
I could not help but notice that all DOM XML calls use an
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
afaik).
I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not think that it
is up to PHP developers to change published
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Brent R. Matzelle wrote:
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not giong to happen. It's a PHP convention to use underscores
to separate words (this was discussed ~ half a year ago
afaik).
I realize that this is a PHP convention, but I do not
Bug #16458 reports that the header() command does not correctly use the
replace parameter (i.e., a header of the same name should be replaced
if this parameter is true). The problem is that the standard
sapi_add_header_ex function assumes that the sapi being used with deal
with any header
Hi,
btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard?
anyway
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
- Brad
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
That would fit the bill nicely.
Brent
__
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
Hi,
I fail to see the advante. Is it only that 'it looks like
what the w3c recommends' and 'so users already used to the
api have it easier' or did I miss something else?
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
--- brad lafountain
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
Understood ;)
Btw, first you said 'w3c convention' now it's a standard?
anyway
Again, I'm no
Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child..
- We started conforming
Hi
Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
to begin with. Instead of having append_child... why not add_child..
'cause
Translation of the PEAR Documentation (http://pear.php.net/manual) to Brazilian
Portuguese language (pt_BR).
I will commit to peardoc repository.
Alexander Merz [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me to request for a cvs account, so I
can commit translated files by myself.
--
PHP Development Mailing
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Yeah thats pretty much it. It does make it eaiser for people using
dom in another lanugage to pick it up in php if it did conform to
the standard. Expecially how we are trying to conform the functions
to begin with. Instead of having
Hi there,
I'm new to the dev list,...
I dropped an email to Andrei and he suggested I post here so, here
goes...
I'm currently developing a set of functions at work for performing samba
related operations. They act as a frontend to smbtools and parse the
text output by these CLI apps.
I'd
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Richard Archer wrote:
Aah, but by the same logic, if Apache 2.0 with PHP4 can provide the
users with a faster, more stable service, it's bad *not* to use it.
It's bad if the beasts are experimental.
Now, I guess this is for the devel list:
libmcrypt4-2.4.19-1mdk
develop a php application
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
51 matches
Mail list logo
