Whee.
I mainly just archive this list and scan it at intervals,
but someone drew my attention to this thread. I am not a
member of the PHP Group, and barely a contributor to PHP,
but I *do* have some experience in working in groups like
this, and *lots* of experience in being abrasive. So I am
Sent to the Apache contact address. I told him I was forwarding
it, but that he might not get a reply if his message was considered
too rude.. :-)
- Forwarded message from Tomas Marklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "Tomas Marklund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re
Is there any particular reason why setcookie() uses the long-
deprecated Netscape cookie syntax? Would anyone object to
my enhancing it to at least allow another argument specifying
the syntax (Netscape Set-Cookie, RFC2109 Set-Cookie, or
RFC2965 Set-Cookie2)?
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagenda
* On 2001-09-07 at 23:06,
Joey Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> So let's be the first ones to get our heads on straight and get rid of
> this ridiculous concept. It is, IMHO, one of the worst ideas in the
> history of the world...I'd really rather be reading perl regu
* On 2001-09-07 at 23:40,
Joey Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote the following to PHP...:
>
> > Um, it has been around since sometime in version 3. Have you
> > noticed it before? Has it
* On 2001-09-07 at 23:42,
Joey Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> No, I haven't, but let me get this straight:
>
> You're saying that if something is a bad idea, that the more often it is
> used, the "less bad" [1] it becomes?
Speaking only for myself and not Chuck, I
* On 2001-09-08 at 08:34,
Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> Not really. You only have to conform if you believe that PHP is not a
> standalone language. You're also assuming that most of PHP's userbase has
> C background, which is usually not true. Among th
Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> Ken - see my point? :)
I have seen it all along. I just do not think that removing
it is better than leaving it forever but discouraging it.
And you cannot say that 'ugliness is not a metric' for anyone
except yourself. Multiple people have brought that aspect up, so
o
Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > Did/do you use gettext in other languages?
>
> No
>
> >If the answer to the latter, at least, is 'no' then I think the
> >experience of people like Rasmus and Chuck -- who *do* use gettext
> >a lot, and in other languages -- carries a helluva lot more weight
> >than
Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
>
> Zeev: were it being added now, no, I wouldn't argue for it.
> My argument is based on it having been there for years and
> being in heavy use in some people's code.
Likewise MHO.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, develo
Joey Smith wrote:
>
> Ken, I whole-heartedly apologize for my rude statments...it is
> simply a measure of my frustration with _() that led to me behave so
> poorly, and I hope you'll forgive me.
Thank you for apologising. Forgiven. :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http:
* On 2001-09-10 at 23:09,
Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> > Please do not dismiss those
> >inputs unless you think they do not count, in which case I
> >suppose we should just accept that you are inflexible and
> >consider your opinion better than anyone els
* On 2001-09-10 at 23:18,
Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say:
>
> The smilie does make it a good natured poke, but at least as far as my
> email parser works, it still means that you mean it, and that stings :)
Well, I *don't* mean it, and I apologise. No ad homine
13 matches
Mail list logo
