Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: tony2001

On 24 Feb 2003 08:21:17 - "Antony Dovgal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Translating PEAR docs to Russian (main purpose, PEAR Russian docs team obviously > need help). > Translating PHP docs to Russian (possibly, if Russian docs team needs some help). Vitaliy Kravchen

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: tony2001

Translating PEAR docs to Russian (main purpose, PEAR Russian docs team obviously need help). Translating PHP docs to Russian (possibly, if Russian docs team needs some help). -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] DLL PHP script for C

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:34:42 -0200 "Fernando Serboncini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mean to make possible to PHP behave like a real C scripting language, like What does "real C scripting language" means ? P.S. take a look at http://gtk.php.net -- Wbr, Antony Do

Re: [PHP-DEV] RFE: trigger_error()

s to trigger_error() > to pass a filename and a line number to it? imho this can be easily solved without adding any parametrs to trigger_error(), if you use your own error_handler. you can pass to it any parameters you want, including __FILE__ and __LINE__. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal aka tony20

Re: [PHP-DEV] month part

ode, String Functions and Date/Time Functions. But you'd better write such questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wbr, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://phpclub.net -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] radius extension

to read this: http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.php --- Wbr, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

Hello All, AG> I don't see why it's such a big deal for people who are creating xml to AG> turn-off short tags? YES! This is the main question/answer of this thread! So, please, people, calm down. Zmievski has got the present for all of you...=)) Antony Dov

Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

y work on servers with it switched DH> on). Hmmm.. I don't see any advantage in forcing people at all. People MUST have choice(and possibility to learn on their own mistakes). I think we can finish this discussion. The answer is NO. Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

Hello all. ZS> changing a number in the version doesn't give us a "carte blanche" to break ZS> compatibility. Compatibility breakage is cumulative - the more you break, ZS> the harder it is to adapt. That's in fact what I'm talking about. Antony Dovgal aka

Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

not necessary for all PHP-community. 2. Possibilty to provide chages is not necessity to provide them. There are a lot of more important things. Thank you for your attention =) Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://phpclub.net -- PHP Development M

Re[4]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

to change php.ini, M> and my experiences with php_set_ini() aren't too good. yep, many of hostings don't allow this. but in 99% XML on such hostings is not allowed too. I think you shouldn't do the wrong thing if someone does... Antony Dovgal aka tony2001

Re[2]: [PHP-DEV] short_open_tag

t; easiest way to move over (if thats what the developers conclude). I don't think that this is the reason to break backward compatibilty. Thousands of programmers use short tags in their scripts, but only hundreds can't change this setting in php.ini manually. Antony Dovgal aka tony20