> That's great, but it shouldn't be the starting point for the project...
> Jani is right that whenever we speak about separating PEAR, or putting
> extensions in it, it's always at some point in the future. Opensource
> projects usually start up and roll once they reach some critical mass, and
>
See pear/scripts/pear
The framework is there.
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 02:04 20/3/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >No, we need tighter integration. We want to be able to do something along
> >the lines of "pear pear.php.net/midgard" and it would go and fetch
> >the the compo
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> >Because the whole point of this was to make life easier on midgard users.
>
> So you're saying that every widely used external (at the moment)
> php-extension should be put into PHP CVS? :)
If it will help users and there is demand for it, sure.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>Because the whole point of this was to make life easier on midgard users.
So you're saying that every widely used external (at the moment)
php-extension should be put into PHP CVS? :)
>And there are a lot of them. There are not a lot of php-gtk users
