I differ with you regarding whether we can or cannot tell people to pause
development for a few weeks. Regardless, if we want to allow people to
develop, I suggested using development branches (or branch), instead of
using a release branch, for most of the duration of this release
cycle.
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:00:57AM -0400, Dan Kalowsky wrote :
Here is an option though. Release RC1. We know it's buggy, we know
it's got a lot of problems, and we know that we don't know them all.
The stigma that snapshots are unstable isn't going to be changed in the
next few days,
I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3 branch and
stick to the main branch for this particular release, at least until we're
very close to the release itself. The vast majority of CVS traffic going
on these days is bug fixes anyway, so creating the branch only makes
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3 branch and
stick to the main branch for this particular release, at least until we're
very close to the release itself. The vast majority of CVS traffic going
on these days is bug
+1 on removing the branch - to avoid problems with staying in sync with head
-1 on the php5 module - it'll move the sync problems to another place
Sander
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 11:01:02AM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think that given the
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Sander Roobol wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 11:01:02AM +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3 branch and
stick to the main branch for this particular release, at least
I think we'd be better off waiting a bit with the php5 move. In general I
just don't think we can push a successful release while we continue
developing. If we concentrate on getting 4.3 out the door within a month,
we can then concentrate on php5.
Zeev
At 13:33 06/10/2002, Derick Rethans
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think we'd be better off waiting a bit with the php5 move. In general I
just don't think we can push a successful release while we continue
developing. If we concentrate on getting 4.3 out the door within a month,
we can then concentrate on
On Sunday 06 October 2002 10:54, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3 branch and
stick to the main branch for this particular release, at least until we're
very close to the release itself. The vast majority of CVS traffic going
on these days is
Since for some reason I didn't get Zeev's original message, I'll just
hack in responses here... :)
On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 05:01 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think that given the circumstances, we should scratch the 4.3
branch and
stick to
Hi,
whether to drop it/name it differently doesn't really fix anything. You need to
sync at some point. I personally prefer to work on the branch, since that will
get the attention of QA and RC processes and after release, merge
everything into
HEAD. But that would require, that HEAD remains
I don't think we can just not provide some place for people to work on new
code. We have way too many extensions in various states of development to
just arbitrarily tell everyone to stop what they are doing. The ext/xslt
work going on right now is a good example along with the image rotation
At 18:18 6-10-2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
When the implicit_flush
mess is resolved and Melvyn gives the thumbs up for the Sablotron stuff
then I think we are ready for RC1.
We're not entering any new features anymore. If we don't hear this doesn't
compile / work, and David has supplied a
Hello,
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the image rotation functions for GD that are waiting in the
wings.
I just updated the sources (http://www.pearfr.org/phpgd), it seems to
work well now(2'bugs' fixed). If it is urgent, I can add now the php
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the image rotation functions for GD that are waiting in the
wings.
I just updated the sources (http://www.pearfr.org/phpgd), it seems to
work well
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 16:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very tempted to clean up the GD source. I hate the way it is
formatted.
Same here, it s a pain to work with it, as well as the big amout of
different functions in the same file ;-)
Nothing has happened
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 01:36:16 +0200
Pierre-Alain Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do believe I ve write access to /php4 (only php4/pear), I
never need it, except now for the gd.
oops :)
I do not believe I ve got the write access to the php4 cvs tree :-)
--
PHP Development Mailing List
Btw, it will be very usefull if someone can add $id and a little
TODO inside the gd source :-)))
I am very tempted to clean up the GD source. I hate the way it is
formatted. Nothing has happened since March 2001 from the Boutell folks
despite numerous bug patches sent their way.
18 matches
Mail list logo
