Re: [PHP-DEV] Reworking DOMXML

2001-07-19 Thread Paul Marquis
I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and is consistent with the libxml2 docs. On Thursday 19 July 2001 07:44, Gavin Sherry wrote: Hi Joey, Good to see some work going on with DOMXML =). On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joey Smith wrote: I think it is a good idea to keep

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reworking DOMXML

2001-07-19 Thread Colin Viebrock
I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and is consistent with the libxml2 docs. Plus, it is then similar to other PHP functions that use an object or handle as the first argument (e.g. mysql_, fopen, fwrite, curl, etc.). - Colin -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] Reworking DOMXML

2001-07-19 Thread Joey Smith
OK, for those who actually commented, there seems to be a consensus. Glad I asked. :) On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote the following to Paul Marquis,...: I prefer style #1 as well -- it preserves backward compatability and is consistent with the libxml2 docs. Plus, it is then

[PHP-DEV] Reworking DOMXML

2001-07-18 Thread Joey Smith
There needs to be a decision made in order to complete the work on domxml, as it currently stands. I think it is a good idea to keep both the procedural and object oriented interfaces in the code. The way the module is currently written, it will take the least amount of work to just require the