I've since looked at it, and I fixed #1 and #3. The other two issues are
not going away any time soon... (that is, "2" and the issue Christian
raised).
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Christian Stocker wrote the following to...:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I've needed to hack
> > I haven't installed libxml 2.4.2 and PHP 4.0.7rc1 yet, but I'm wondering
if
> > someone can tell me which API version is in use? This script should
tell
> > you:
> >
>
> By your script, B is in use for 4.0.7. I'm going to look at this
> tonight, perhaps we can merge the 2 somehow before .7 go
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I haven't installed libxml 2.4.2 and PHP 4.0.7rc1 yet, but I'm wondering if
> someone can tell me which API version is in use? This script should tell
> you:
>
By your script, B is in use for 4.0.7. I'm g
Seriously, if someone has 2.4.1 on his system and it works why
push him to use 2.4.2 when he's comfortable with it?
I'ld vote for at leat 2.4.1 .
- Markus
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 09:37:38AM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote :
>
> >From libxml changelog:
>
> <
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Colin Viebrock wrote:
> FWIW, I've needed to hack my code to handle three differences between
> the 2 different API versions. To be honest, I can't keep track of
> which API was in which release of PHP, so I'll just call them API A)
> and API B).
>
> 1) Names of tags:
>
FWIW, I've needed to hack my code to handle three differences between the 2
different API versions. To be honest, I can't keep track of which API was
in which release of PHP, so I'll just call them API A) and API B).
1) Names of tags:
API A) $node->name
API B) $node->tagname
2) Tag attr
On Yesterday, Joey Smith wrote:
> That will change shortly.
saw the cvs-commit. But just one question (out of curiosity):
what's the sense of asking for 2.4.2, when 2.4.1 seems to work as well? Or
did I just not hit "that" bug in 2.4.1 till now :)
chregu
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Christian Stoc
That will change shortly.
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Christian Stocker wrote the following to...:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> >
> > DOMXML is an experimental extension. So you can expect it
> > to change still.."Your mileage may vary" :)
> > e.g. In 4.0.7 the required libxml versi
At 00:54 19-08-01, Markus Fischer wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:07:08PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote :
> > Changes in experimental extensions don't require NEWS
> > entries. The NEWS file is already too hard to read.
> > With all those changes mentioned in it, it will become
> > totally useless
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 11:07:08PM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote :
> Changes in experimental extensions don't require NEWS
> entries. The NEWS file is already too hard to read.
> With all those changes mentioned in it, it will become
> totally useless.
-1
A news entry won't hurt that much it will
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> DOMXML is an experimental extension. So you can expect it
> to change still.."Your mileage may vary" :)
> e.g. In 4.0.7 the required libxml version will be 2.4.2.
mmmh, JFYI, i have here only 2.4.1, but it seems to work with no problems.
chregu
--
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>
> DOMXML is an experimental extension. So you can expect it
> to change still.."Your mileage may vary" :)
> e.g. In 4.0.7 the required libxml version will be 2.4.2.
>
> You obviously haven't read the manual..
sure, i read the manual and i'm aware of th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joey
Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian:
> The only change that I am aware of is the removal of half of the
> aliases that domxml used to use. For example, previous versions had both
> $node->tagname and $node->tag_name, which both returned the same
>
Christian:
The only change that I am aware of is the removal of half of the
aliases that domxml used to use. For example, previous versions had both
$node->tagname and $node->tag_name, which both returned the same
structure. I have removed all of the former in favor of the latter, to
hold to PHP
14 matches
Mail list logo
