Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Joe T.
Looking forward to working on PSR-5 since i missed my chance for 12. As far as 12 goes, i really do hope some genuine discussion happens for the inconsistencies and concerns raised by Larry before it's finalized. If no other reason raised so far makes sense, consider how much simple it would be

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Larry Garfield
When PSRs 9 and 10 were first given numbers securitytxt.org didn't exist yet. :-) And they've not really been updated since then, hence their current abandoned status. Once the WGs are reassembled it would make sense to look at securitytxt.org and similar efforts to see what can be stolen^W bo

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Chuck Burgess
I'll be unavailable next week (traveling with a high school group), so I'll reach out to everyone about starting the WG the following week 👍 CRB On Mar 16, 2018 07:43, "Ben Ramsey" wrote: I’m interested in working with Chuck and Gary on PSR-5. Cheers, Ben On Mar 16, 2018, at 03:46, Alessandr

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Matthew Brown
I'm happy to work on PSR-5 On Friday, 16 March 2018 04:46:17 UTC-4, Alessandro Lai wrote: > > Hello everyone, > we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the > PSR which are pending, as a way to update you members and the whole > community on our work, and also to star

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread info
I would like to help too... But question for PSR-10 why not using security.txt ( http://securitytxt.org )? On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 11:21:14 AM UTC-4, Chris Cornutt wrote: > > I'd like to get back involved with PSR-9/PSR-10 to help out whoever ends > up leading that effort. I'd still like to

Re: The progress of HTTP client

2018-03-16 Thread Tobias Nyholm
Thank you Luis for the feedback. Here are some short answers: * Regarding async: See the meta document: https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/master/proposed/http-client/http-client-meta.md * Method signature: We want to make sure that major libraries could implement this interface wit

Re: The progress of HTTP client

2018-03-16 Thread Luis Pabón
My 2p: - This PSR needs async, otherwise there's not much value on it - I'd recommend following closely what guzzle is already doing - sendRequest is redundant. public function send(RequestInterface $request): Response - Exceptions should be way more verbose: need BadRequestExce

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Chris Cornutt
I'd like to get back involved with PSR-9/PSR-10 to help out whoever ends up leading that effort. I'd still like to see some of the projects come in. It seems like there are several out there already making a serious investment in the security of their project including Drupal, WordPress, Symfony

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Michael Babker
Hi, I'd be interested in helping with PSR-9/10 as a past lead (and still current member of) Joomla's security team. On Friday, March 16, 2018 at 3:46:17 AM UTC-5, Alessandro Lai wrote: > > Hello everyone, > we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the > PSR which are

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread e . courtial30
Hi I am very interested to help on PSR-19. Cheers Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroup

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread e . courtial30
Hi I am very interested to help on PSR-19. Cheers Eric Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 04:46:17 UTC-4, Alessandro Lai a écrit : > > Hello everyone, > we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the > PSR which are pending, as a way to update you members and the whole > commu

Re: PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Ben Ramsey
I’m interested in working with Chuck and Gary on PSR-5. Cheers, Ben > On Mar 16, 2018, at 03:46, Alessandro Lai wrote: > > Hello everyone, > we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the PSR > which are pending, as a way to update you members and the whole community

PSR status update

2018-03-16 Thread Alessandro Lai
Hello everyone, we (the secretaries) decided it was time to post a status update for the PSR which are pending, as a way to update you members and the whole community on our work, and also to start discussion around some PSR that need a little more participation. Here it is: PSR-5 (PHPDoc) Sta

Re: Abandoned PSR-5

2018-03-16 Thread Alessandro Lai
Hello all! If anyone like you is interested in helping pushing PSR-5 back in the draft stage, please contact Chuck (which is willing to step in as a new Editor) or to us secretaries (me, Mark Railton or Margaret Staples). We need 5 persons (including an editor and a CC sponsor) to build a Workin