The survey showed what was common, which became what was standard, as I
recall.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hey Spencer,
To answer these why's, the team behind PSR-2 did a survey of commonalities
amongst PHP frameworks: http://www.php-fig.org/psr/psr-2/#appendix-a-survey
Kind regards
Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability
It's an interesting idea, but I've always understood @method to be an
inherited thing. So that "extends \X\Y" or "@mixin \X\Y" indicate where to
find inherited methods, and @method/@mixin applied to the parent also
applies to the child.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi folks,
I'd like to nominate Sam, but I'm not a voting member. Would anyone else
like to? Sam is the original author, and a current core committer of the
SilverStripe framework and CMS. He's a talented developer, an insightful
project leader, and a wonderful human. Here's a bit of history,
Could we lock this thread please? I think it's getting blown way out of
proportion, and is just as harmful to the nomination as it is to the
expression of opinion.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To
Hey Matthew,
Let's take a step back here. I have given a reason for why I think it's a
bad idea, but I'ave also said (very clearly I think) that it's just my
personal opinion. That these are two very capable people, and that
*sometimes* being reactive isn't the only approach we could take. You
The only concern I have* here is that Graham has also been nominated, and
that I don't think it's best for the committee for spouses to be on it
together.
* I love both these people, and I think they're both qualified and
fantastic humans. I'd be saying the same thing if any other couple were
>
> Somebody who feels he's not "adding value" is a very poor choice for a CC
> member.
Not to put words in Graham's mouth (or Michael's mouth), but the previous
FIG structure is *very* different from this new incarnation. I didn't feel
like I was adding enough value to justify the amount
Performing managerial tasks doesn't make someone a manager of people. I
suggest we ask ourselves the question - does FIG 3.0's definition of the
secretaries differ from the current bylaws definition of the secretaries?
Does the current definition of secretaries (or someone's disagreement of
Hey folks,
Nominations appear to be proceeding well. Given how many people (and
diverse personalities) have been nominated, it seems appropriate to discuss
the issue of harmony between secretaries. Let me give two examples:
1. Paul and Phil get voted in at the same time. What does that mean
The potential for Paul and Phil being secretaries together. What is
happening to this day?
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>
> secretaries taking an active role in a discussion threads, versus aiding
> members in understanding content
I don't understand the difference. Unless by "aiding members in
understanding" you mean not speaking. Then I understand the difference. :)
--
You received this message because you
Hi Tom,
> So is this thread really going to go on an on until Paul comes here and
> agrees or disagrees with each "You're an asshole" comment on here?
No, that is not the case. Many folks have suggested options which are not
limited to expulsion or language reviews. If you go to back to
Joshua,
As far as I can tell, your first comment on this thread (on the 19th) came
a day after Michael asked Paul to respond to proposed measures to address
the problem under discussion (on the 18th). You are not the first person to
suggest actions, nor are we all waiting for you, but rather a
>
> I will not disclose who as it is for individuals to make their own cases
My strongest motivation for leaving was Paul's conduct on this list,
towards me and others. For the record: I do not care to discuss different
political views we may hold elsewhere. He is technically proficient and I
15 matches
Mail list logo
