Kudos to you for stepping down on your proposal and to have listened to
feedback!
The fact that this PR hilights how much text is removed from the PSR
underlines how much the delegate lookup needs a separate PSR. I think it
will be better on the long run, also because you will be able to
Le jeudi 17 novembre 2016 18:58:24 UTC+1, Larry Garfield a écrit :
>
> My main concern is that as presented the delegate
> feature is not really a feature, more a "by the way, here's this cool
> thing you can do."
It's more something like: "by the way, if you implement DDL, your users can
I'm fine with both option (include or don't include it in PSR-11).
As you said David, it's a design pattern. We don't *need* to standardize it
to use it. Containers that want to do stuff like that can, it's not
required for decoupling frameworks from containers.
If it's really needed it could
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:02:48 -0800 (PST)
David Négrier wrote:
> My whole point is that in order to have containers working side by
> side, having a 'composite container' delegating the lookup of entries
> to sub-containers is not enough.
> You also have to make sure that
Thanks David for such a comprehensive roundup of what's being proposed. I
personally found the time and effort you put into explaining the problem a
great help.
I am against adding this functionality for reasons already stated - I
believe it's out of the scope of this PSR and would be an
I agree with Alessandro.
Since this seems a pretty controversial point, I would drop it, in favor of
continuing the discussion into a new separate PSR, or maybe the "add stuff
in the container" PSR.
PSR-11 is just a stepping stone for everything in this area, so I would
prefer to drop it and
On 17/11/2016 11:29, David Négrier wrote:
I know some of you have doubts about this part of the PSR, so the first
thing might be to decide whether we want to keep it or not. If we decide
to keep it, I'm sure there are plenty of things we can do to improve the
wording :)
I see the advantages
Ok folks!
I've been delaying this for a while to give some room for the rest of the
questions about PSR-11, but now is the time to dwelve into the details of
the delegate lookup feature :)
I know some of you have doubts about this part of the PSR, so the first
thing might be to decide whether we