Wait, I thought Core Committee voted on acceptance of PSRs and member
projects continued voting on things like this. Are you saying Core
Committee has a separate vote on this? How does that affect the member
project votes? Maybe I should have read the new bylaws a few more times,
because this
On Monday, February 13, 2017 at 1:42:16 PM UTC-5, Jason Coward wrote:
>
> That's where I replied from. Still confused. This thread was going to be
> deleted according to the other thread. Are we having separate threads for
> Core Committee and Member Project voting on such issues? That doesn't
That's where I replied from. Still confused. This thread was going to be
deleted according to the other thread. Are we having separate threads for
Core Committee and Member Project voting on such issues? That doesn't make
any sense.
On Monday, February 13, 2017 at 9:07:29 AM UTC-7, Chris
On Feb 13, 2017 9:22 AM, "Jason Coward" wrote:
I thought this thread was being deleted and we were supposed to vote in the
Member Project thread? A little confusion.
GMail is not threading it correctly. I'd suggest going to the Google group
page and replying there.
-Chris
+/- 0 PyroCMS
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
> Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
>
+1 from PPI
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Shefik wrote:
> + 1 from Zikula
>
> - Shefik
>
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney <
> mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:
+ 1 from Zikula
- Shefik
> On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a
+1 from Jackalope
> On 06 Feb 2017, at 17:54, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like
Errr to early to be reading and typing at the same time :S
+1
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:52 AM Korvin Szanto wrote:
> +1 Phergie
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:40 AM Samantha Quiñones
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are
+1 Phergie
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:40 AM Samantha Quiñones
wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
+1
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
> Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
>
>
+1
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 11:54:18 AM UTC-5, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
> Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
>
>
0
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
+1
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 5:54:18 PM UTC+1, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
> Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
>
> Discussion
+1
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:54:18 AM UTC-6, Chris Tankersley wrote:
>
> It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
> Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
> Committee.
>
> Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
>
>
It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for Core
Committee.
Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
Discussion Thread:
It's been well past 2 weeks while having a discussion period on allowing
Phergie as a member project, and here is the voting thread for the Core
Committee.
Please vote with a -1/0/+1, like normal.
Discussion Thread:
18 matches
Mail list logo