On 02/08/2016 13:45, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
To me its important that anyone on this list does not see the -1 from
Jackalope on the expulsion vote is considered an endorsement with
Paul’s discussion style. I have already contacted him before when I
wanted to give him concrete feedback. At this
> On 02 Aug 2016, at 13:10, Matteo Beccati wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On 01/08/2016 17:50, GeeH wrote:
>> It was agreed as a group, that voting +1 for the replacement of Paul was
>> inherently pointless, as removing Paul as the voting representative is a
>> moot action
Hi Gary,
On 01/08/2016 17:50, GeeH wrote:
It was agreed as a group, that voting +1 for the replacement of Paul was
inherently pointless, as removing Paul as the voting representative is a
moot action resulting in no perceptible change to the situation. As
Matthew was one of the public