+1 from Revive Adserver
On 09/11/2016 18:08, Michael Cullum wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee
> nomination period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0 implementation
> timetable back a month (so the new implementation date will be 1st
> February)?
+1 from Horde.
Zitat von Michael Cullum :
Answering this required me working backwards so I just did the full
timetable. The new FIG 3.0 transition timetable would be as follows:
1st November: CC Nominations open
7TH DECEMBER: CC
No objection from Zikula either.
-
Shefik
+1 914-548-5033 mobile
she...@shefik.info
Portfolio: http://shefik.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shefik
Twitter: @shefik_info
GitHub: https://github.com/shefik
The information contained in
No objections from Phing.
On 09-11-16 18:08, Michael Cullum wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee
nomination period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0 implementation
timetable back a month (so the new implementation date will be 1st
February)?
There
Hi Michael,
I am happy with this. I think it is the right call to make.
Many thanks,
Paul
On 9 Nov 2016 17:09, "Michael Cullum" wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination
period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0
Answering this required me working backwards so I just did the full
timetable. The new FIG 3.0 transition timetable would be as follows:
1st November: CC Nominations open
*7th December: CC Nominations close* (Initial nominations, people can
accept nominations after this so long as voting hasn't
We definitely need to delay this. Thank you for raising the issue Michael
and Roman.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:53 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> Under the circumstances, I do not object. What end-date are you proposing
> for nominations? Early December?
>
> --Larry Garfield
No objection from PEAR...
CRB
On Nov 9, 2016 11:09 AM, "Michael Cullum" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have any objections to extending the Core Committee nomination
> period one month and pushing the FIG 3.0 implementation timetable back a
> month (so the new
Hi Michael,
The PHP-FIG Core Commitee deserves to have the best members we can find.
The 10 days timeline was certainly too short and if we need to choose
between the respecting the fixed timeline or giving us more time to find
the best people, I'm definitely for the later solution.
I'm not a