Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Thanks for the interest. I already have a revived Working Group and updated documents. Right now I'm just waiting on our Sponsor to call an Entrance Vote. Watch for this to happen, and then we'll be able to have Draft phase discussions on the docs... join in at that point 👍 CRB On Thu, Sep 13,

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Also interested in helping if you need more people. Similar to Joe, i am new to the WG process but happy to help if you need me Nikos Phalcon Framework On Monday, February 12, 2018 at 8:04:45 PM UTC-5, Chuck Burgess wrote: > > At this point, I have a CC sponsor and one WG member. > > Joe T., are

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I don't, sorry. G On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 at 18:18 Chuck Burgess wrote: > Gary, > > Do you know anyone back at JetBrains that might want to be in the Working > Group? > > CRB > *about.me/ashnazg * > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Michael Cullum > wrote: > >> Now that G

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Gary, Do you know anyone back at JetBrains that might want to be in the Working Group? CRB *about.me/ashnazg * On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Michael Cullum wrote: > Now that Gary is no longer involved with Jetbrains it might be wise to get > some other IDE/CS-fixer-

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Now that Gary is no longer involved with Jetbrains it might be wise to get some other IDE/CS-fixer-style tool representation in the working group. Michael On 13 Feb 2018 10:20 am, "'Alexander Makarov' via PHP Framework Interoperability Group" wrote: I'm still interested as well so if you need m

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I'm still interested as well so if you need my input, I'm ready to make it. On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 4:04:45 AM UTC+3, Chuck Burgess wrote: > > At this point, I have a CC sponsor and one WG member. > > Joe T., are you still interested? > > On Jan 31, 2018 09:45, "Gary Hockin" > wrote: > >>

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

(Beyond reading the current draft, that is.) -jlt On Monday, 12 February 2018 21:17:41 UTC-5, Joe T. wrote: > > Chuck, > > Sure! i'm new to the WG process, so might need some guidance, but i've > been working with PHP for 15+ years. > > Let me know where i start. :) > -joe > > > On Monday, 12 Feb

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Chuck, Sure! i'm new to the WG process, so might need some guidance, but i've been working with PHP for 15+ years. Let me know where i start. :) -joe On Monday, 12 February 2018 20:04:45 UTC-5, Chuck Burgess wrote: > > At this point, I have a CC sponsor and one WG member. > > Joe T., are you s

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

At this point, I have a CC sponsor and one WG member. Joe T., are you still interested? On Jan 31, 2018 09:45, "Gary Hockin" wrote: > Yep, I'll sponsor and be involved in the WG. > > G > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 at 15:43 Chuck Burgess wrote: > >> Gary Hockin, Alexander Makarov, Richard Quadling:

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Yep, I'll sponsor and be involved in the WG. G On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 at 15:43 Chuck Burgess wrote: > Gary Hockin, Alexander Makarov, Richard Quadling: > Are you three still available for the initial working group? > > > Core Committee: > Can I get a willing sponsor for PSR-5? > > CRB > > -- > You

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Gary Hockin, Alexander Makarov, Richard Quadling: Are you three still available for the initial working group? Core Committee: Can I get a willing sponsor for PSR-5? CRB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group.

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

That's great news! As per our bylaws (http://www.php-fig.org/bylaws/psr-workflow/#abandoned), you don't need our approval to go forward, you only need to restart the process from the draft stage. To do that you'll need: - an editor (which you are requesting to be) - a CC sponsor (as you said)

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Secretaries, I'd like to request taking over as Editor on PSR-5, and request a new Core Committee sponsor as per the new workflow. I'm not too far off from finishing the preliminary phpdoc3 alpha release steps that I wanted in place before resuming this effort. CRB -- You received this messag

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Is participation open to anyone here? i'm pretty new to the group, but part of my job is code & docs guidelines in my organization, so i have a keen interest in standardization. i came to the party a bit late to say much on 12, but this would be a good exercise if there's room for me. Thanks. :

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I hope to nudge it as close as I can. Part of what stalled PSR5 was much contention on how to *add/change* what phpdoc2 could already do. CRB *about.me/ashnazg * On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Damian Mooyman wrote: > That's awesome Chuck. Will phpDocumentor3 be based

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

That's awesome Chuck. Will phpDocumentor3 be based on psr-5? On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 07:25:54 UTC+13, Chuck Burgess wrote: > > Hey everyone, > I intend to get this rolling again soon. I'm first working on helping get > phpDocumentor3 finished up, so that I'll have a baseline implementation t

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Hey everyone, I intend to get this rolling again soon. I'm first working on helping get phpDocumentor3 finished up, so that I'll have a baseline implementation to work from. Once that's released, I'll be re-pinging this thread to see about formally building a Working Group. CRB -- You receiv

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I'm available for this, I would be very interested in getting PHPDoc standardised. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-f

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Sorry for relative silence from me, but if you need help on getting momentum on this PSR I'm keen to give a bit of effort on this as well. Please let me know how I can best contribute, thanks. :) I would love to see some of the work other members have been developing make it's way into a pratic

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Hi Gary, If you still need people, I can join. El lunes, 10 de julio de 2017, 12:25:10 (UTC+2), GeeH escribió: > > I am serious about getting PSR-5 moving again and would like to form a > working group to get this accepted. From what I can see it's not in a bad > place to be finished, it just ne

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I am happy to help with that. I have implemented API doc parser for Yii Framework 2 so I can bring my experience in from there. best regards, Carsten Am Montag, 10. Juli 2017 12:25:10 UTC+2 schrieb GeeH: > > I am serious about getting PSR-5 moving again and would like to form a > working group

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Hi Gary, I am currently working on a refactoring/introspection tool (phpactor[1]) so would benefit from this work as would many others. Happy to contribute to the working group :) Cheers, Dan [1] https://github.com/phpactor/phpactor On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:25:10AM -0700, GeeH wrote: >I

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Hey Gary, I can help out. The company I'm with is currently doing a documentation sprint for Drupal, so we/I have a bit of experience writing the stuff. Let me know what you need out of me and I can get started! Matt On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 3:25:10 AM UTC-7, GeeH wrote: > > I am serious abo

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

Hello Gary. I'd like to get this moving too. Areas where I can hopefully "get things done". 1. PHP Documentation. I'm a member of the PHP Documentation Team and am working to get the method and function signatures within PHP matching the PHP 7's syntax. 2. PHPStan (Static analysis tool for PHP

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I can join... CRB On Jul 10, 2017 5:25 AM, "GeeH" wrote: I am serious about getting PSR-5 moving again and would like to form a working group to get this accepted. From what I can see it's not in a bad place to be finished, it just needs a few more revisions and to have some momentum again. If a

Re: Working Group for PSR-5

I am. On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 1:25:10 PM UTC+3, GeeH wrote: > > I am serious about getting PSR-5 moving again and would like to form a > working group to get this accepted. From what I can see it's not in a bad > place to be finished, it just needs a few more revisions and to have some > mo

Working Group for PSR-5

I am serious about getting PSR-5 moving again and would like to form a working group to get this accepted. From what I can see it's not in a bad place to be finished, it just needs a few more revisions and to have some momentum again. If anyone is interested please let me know. Gary -- You re