Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > Happy new year everyone! > > The vote ended yesterday, and passed! Thanks all for taking the time to > review. > What Jordi said :-) Upon putting together the initial version of PSR-16, I set up some Docker

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Happy new year everyone! The vote ended yesterday, and passed! Thanks all for taking the time to review. Here are the stats: Number of Non-Voters 10 Positive Votes 24 Negative Votes 3 Abstain Votes0 Voters 27 Total Number of Members 37

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from PrestaShop Le 18/12/2016 16:25, Jordi Boggiano a écrit : After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 headquarters. Please find the specification here: -

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Zikula > On Dec 30, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Damian Mooyman wrote: > > +1 SilverStripe > >> On Monday, 19 December 2016 04:25:54 UTC+13, Jordi Boggiano wrote: >> After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all >> involved), I think we are ready for a

[VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from eZ But we really need to make the distinction between this and psr-6 clear, including stating psr-6 will be the one getting user facing features like pherhaps tagging in the future. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 concrete5 On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:58 PM Matthew Weier O'Phinney < mweierophin...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 from Zend Framework > > I'm missing a few details in the meta document and the spec for which I > cannot find discussions: > > - I've seen a number of libraries allow a callback for the

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

-1 from Zend Framework I'm missing a few details in the meta document and the spec for which I cannot find discussions: - I've seen a number of libraries allow a callback for the "default" value, which allows deferring calculation of such a value until it's needed. Was this ever considered? If

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Hey, +1 from Wikibase and SMW Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw | https://entropywins.wtf | https://keybase.io/jeroendedauw Software craftsmanship advocate | Developer at Wikimedia Germany ~=[,,_,,]:3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 for Joomla Robert Am Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2016 16:25:54 UTC+1 schrieb Jordi Boggiano: > > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 > headquarters. > > Please find the specification here: > > - > >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Icicle. On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 9:25:54 AM UTC-6, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 > headquarters. > > Please find the specification here: > > - > >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Revive Adserver On 18/12/2016 16:25, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 headquarters. > > Please find the specification here: > > - >

[VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Pyro -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from PHPixie Already implemented in todays php/cache =) On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 4:25:54 PM UTC+1, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 > headquarters. > > Please

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Yii. On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 10:25:54 PM UTC+7, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 > headquarters. > > Please find the specification here: > > - > >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Hey Everyone, I just wanted to comment on the post above regarding process. Larry is correct in that modifications (beyond typos) during review require the spec to go back into draft status. However, at the time, neither the sponsor nor the coordinator decided to pull the spec from review and

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from phpBB On Sunday, December 18, 2016 at 4:25:54 PM UTC+1, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > > After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all > involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 > headquarters. > > Please find the specification here: > > - > >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Jackalope regards, Lukas > On 23 Dec 2016, at 21:24, Fabien Potencier wrote: > > +1 Symfony > >> On 12/23/16 20:42, Cees-Jan Kiewiet wrote: >> +1 from ReactPHP >> >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Leo Feyer > >

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 Symfony On 12/23/16 20:42, Cees-Jan Kiewiet wrote: +1 from ReactPHP On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Leo Feyer > wrote: +1 from Contao -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from ReactPHP On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Leo Feyer wrote: > +1 from Contao > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

+1 from Contao -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

On 19/12/2016 16:14, Larry Garfield wrote: The spec was non-trivially altered just recently, wasn't it? That means the 2 week review period needs to be reset, so people have a chance to review the latest changes and give feedback if necessary. No it wasn't non-trivially altered. I did two

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

On 12/18/2016 09:25 AM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 headquarters. Please find the specification here: -

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Hey, +1 for PPI Framework Engine Can the rest of the group please get behind this, and vote? Many thanks, Paul On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: > Before I forget, +1 for Composer :) > > -- > Jordi Boggiano > @seldaek - http://seld.be > > -- > You

Re: [VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

Before I forget, +1 for Composer :) -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek - http://seld.be -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[VOTE][Accept] PSR-16: Simple Cache

After a fruitful month of review and final tweaks (thanks to all involved), I think we are ready for a vote here at the PSR-16 headquarters. Please find the specification here: - https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/1d4f586d0bbe7e30cf8972268be8cef9d321fdcc/proposed/simplecache.md