Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-12 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-1 from Zend Framework (We polled our contributors some years ago; particularly amongst non-native English speakers, coming up with reasonable names for interfaces was often difficult, and appending an Interface suffix simplified that for many authors.) On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Michael

[VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-11 Thread André R .
-1 from eZ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-11 Thread Paul Dragoonis
-1 from PPI Framework On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Andres Gutierrez < gutierrezandresfel...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 from Phalcon > > On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-09 Thread Andres Gutierrez
-1 from Phalcon On Sunday, 4 September 2016 11:26:50 UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-09 Thread Larry Garfield
-1 --Larry Garfield, Drupal On 09/04/2016 11:26 AM, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG must

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-09 Thread Korvin Szanto
-1 concrete5 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:42 PM Ryan Thompson wrote: > -1 PyroCMS > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-08 Thread Ryan Thompson
-1 PyroCMS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-08 Thread Marc Alexander
-1 from phpBB On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 6:26:50 PM UTC+2, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-06 Thread Jason Coward
-1 from Slim Framework Regards, Jason Coward Slim Framework Michael Cullum September 4, 2016 at 10:26 AM Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-06 Thread 'Robert Deutz' via PHP Framework Interoperability Group
-1 for Joomla Robert Am Sonntag, 4. September 2016 18:26:50 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Cullum: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Adam Culp
-1 IBMiToolkit On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 12:26:50 PM UTC-4, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Paul Jones
-1 from Aura/Solar/etc. -- Paul M. Jones http://paul-m-jones.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Jan Schneider
-1 from Horde Zitat von Michael Cullum : Hi all,   The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members.   STATUS QUO: The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread 'Alexander Makarov' via PHP Framework Interoperability Group
-1 from Yii. On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 7:26:50 PM UTC+3, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Michiel Rook
-1 from Phing On 04-09-16 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they > are unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published > by the PHP FIG must have the

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Leo Feyer
-1 from Contao -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-05 Thread Matteo Beccati
Hi, -1 from Revive Adserver On 04/09/2016 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG must have

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Fabien Potencier
-1 Symfony On 9/4/16 09:26, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members. *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by the PHP FIG must have the interface name suffix

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Damian Mooyman
-1 SilverStripe On Monday, 5 September 2016 04:26:50 UTC+12, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by >

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Chris Tankersley
-1 from Sculpin. As others said, this is just change for change's sake. -Chris On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Michael Cullum wrote: > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > >

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Lukas Kahwe Smith
-1 from Jackalope regards, Lukas > On 04 Sep 2016, at 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > Status Quo: The bylaw states that all

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Jordi Boggiano
-1 for Composer - this is change for the sake of change IMO, I'd rather people spent time on more productive discussions :) On 04/09/2016 18:26, Michael Cullum wrote: Hi all, The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are unable to do so not being voting members.

Re: [VOTE] [Bylaw Amendment] Do not require interface suffix on future PSR Interfaces

2016-09-04 Thread Chuck Burgess
-1 from PEAR On Sep 4, 2016 11:26, "Michael Cullum" wrote: > Hi all, > > The PSR-11 Editors have requested we open this vote for them as they are > unable to do so not being voting members. > > *Status Quo:* The bylaw states that all interfaces in PSRs published by > the