It flance wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Fedora 8. I installed php, mysql and apache. Now i can run a
script connecting to a database from terminal but not from browser.
Any suggestion?
Have you configured apache to process php scripts?
See item 14 at
tedd wrote:
However, it's one thing to have a keyboard designed for a specific
language and another to be able to enter code-points that aren't
associated with any specific language (i.e., Dingbats and Math
Symbols).
Ah yes, that's true. How about an APL2 keyboard then? :-)
For example,
tedd wrote:
But as it is now, it's not so much IF the domain name is easy to
type in or not, but rather does the Rx.com show up in the URL once
you get there? And it does for most browsers other than IE.
You can get to the site very easily, try typing:
http://rx-2.com
That wasn't
Yeti wrote:
That Rx.com domain name is really great stuff, but how do you expect
the average user to type it in?
Completely separate question - I finally managed to get to Tedds site,
where I read this:
The ℞symbol is a truly global icon for Pharmaceuticals. What
Pharmaceutical company
Per Jessen wrote:
tedd wrote:
But as it is now, it's not so much IF the domain name is easy to
type in or not, but rather does the Rx.com show up in the URL once
you get there? And it does for most browsers other than IE.
You can get to the site very easily, try typing:
At 12:05 AM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
On 29 Aug 2008, at 22:07, tedd wrote:
I hesitated before writing this because I don't want to get into
another debate with you, but accessibility means that all people
(disabled or not) can access the data they want in a similar
fashion.
Why hesitate?
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good Javascript related mailing list?
Thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing:
http://www.phpguru.org/RGraph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:00, tedd wrote:
At 12:05 AM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
On 29 Aug 2008, at 22:07, tedd wrote:
I hesitated before writing this because I don't want to get into
another debate with you, but accessibility means that all people
(disabled or not) can access the data they
At 11:51 PM +0200 8/29/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
Eric Gorr schreef:
There is no documentation anywhere which claims, as you do, that it
is impossible to design a captcha which deals with accessibility
issues.
on behalf of the list, please accept our Crayon of the Week award.
Oh, and please
Jochem Maas wrote:
T Lensselink schreef:
Catalin Zamfir Alexandru, DATAGRAM SRL wrote:
Hello guys,
I've been stalking on the list for some time. Didn't
have
anything to report/talk, until now. I have a code like this, maybe
you guys
can reproduce it, with output buffering
On 30 Aug 2008, at 05:32, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:25 -0400, Eric Gorr wrote:
On Aug 30, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:05 -0400, Eric Gorr wrote:
Oh, here's an interesting story:
hi all,
I'm sending this email only to ask if someone know if the works of
__call in private methods is bug or feature.
ex.
class user {
public function __call ( $name, $arguments ) {
do something
return call_user_func( array( $this, $name ), $arguments );
}
private function xpto ( $arguments )
Richard Heyes wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good Javascript related mailing list?
http://lists.evolt.org/mailman/listinfo/javascript perhaps.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi gang:
At 1:16 PM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
Now, about that recommendation for my linked in profile... ;)
That's not a bad idea. Daniel and I did an exchange a while back. I
think it might help to land clients if we can use our linked-in
status in some way. I haven't done that yet, but
Is it possible to do permanent redirect (301) with php ? If possible...
which is more efficient, by using .htaccess or php redirect ?
Thanks,
Feris
At 11:39 PM +0200 8/29/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
tedd schreef:
Do you not agree?
yes and no. in the wild a lion with hip atrophy will be forced to
crawl away and die ... no more eating gazelles for him
I hope I don't get finger atrophy.
---
my point being we have a long long long way to go
On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:42, Feris wrote:
Is it possible to do permanent redirect (301) with php ? If
possible...
which is more efficient, by using .htaccess or php redirect ?
If using PHP 4.3 or above...
header('Location: http://website.com/some/page.html', true, 301);
See
At 11:51 PM +0200 8/29/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
so orthogonal to the turing test ... I'd wager that research in
turing test passing technology is moving faster that captcha tech.
so in the long run captcha is plain dead in the water.
I agree with that.
Creating a better captcha is a losing
At 12:14 AM +0200 8/30/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
I have no shame ... I'm dutch.
That's obvious. :-)
Rhetorical
What we (i.e., USA Government) needs to do is to get you people (yeah
I said you people) down to New Orleans to teach us how to make a
dike. Seriously, your countrymen are the
Oh look, you forgot to include the list again.
On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:54, Eric Gorr wrote:
On Aug 30, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Stut wrote:
Eric...
1) Quoting an NYT blog as an authority on technical matters is both
naive and asking for it. The mainstream press have never used
industry-specific
At 11:56 PM +0100 8/29/08, Stut wrote:
On 29 Aug 2008, at 22:39, Jochem Maas wrote:
in the mean time, here's wishing more clean water and internet access
for everyone (and less bombs).
Hear hear, except that I'd put food above internet access.
-Stut
Yep, right up there with health care
On 30 Aug 2008, at 13:38, tedd wrote:
At 1:16 PM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
Now, about that recommendation for my linked in profile... ;)
That's not a bad idea. Daniel and I did an exchange a while back. I
think it might help to land clients if we can use our linked-in
status in some way.
Robert Cummings schreef:
...
using bots to crack Google’s captchas.
I really don't see how this story supports your arguments in the least
and as such I will not be answering anymore of your drivel. You appear
to have nothing of usefulness to add to the conversation.
I didn't think it
Diogo Neves schreef:
hi all,
I'm sending this email only to ask if someone know if the works of
__call in private methods is bug or feature.
ex.
class user {
public function __call ( $name, $arguments ) {
do something
return call_user_func( array( $this, $name ), $arguments );
the fatal
Jim Lucas schreef:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:01 -0400, Eric Gorr wrote:
No, I will not help you troll. But, I certainly cannot prevent you
from doing so.
Hopefully the list moderators will shut you down.
This is PHP General. We discuss PHP and related issues.
thanks,
well, the 'new' woks the same with ou without '()' after class, I think...
and I now how it works, i only don't understand why... if the method
is not available outside of class it should go to __call function like
if it doesn't exist...
it doesn't make any sense to anyone else?
On
On 30 Aug 2008, at 14:05, tedd wrote:
At 11:39 PM +0200 8/29/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
I think both tedd and Stut make good points, I guess we'll all be
hacking away at such issues for a long time to come.
That's the nature of the beast (no not Stut!)
I am Stut - hear me Roar!!
CAPTCHA's are
At 12:05 AM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
On 29 Aug 2008, at 22:07, tedd wrote:
Do you not agree?
Sort of. I think most disabled people accept that they are different
and that special provisions sometimes need to be made. In this case
I would hope people would understand that the current
At 12:32 AM -0400 8/30/08, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:25 -0400, Eric Gorr wrote:
Please, would all of the other readers of this mailing list write
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and ask them to shut Robert Cummings down? Thank you.
I'm sorry list *lol* But this one made me
At 3:27 PM +0200 8/30/08, Jochem Maas wrote:
2. you can't shut him down either, he does'nt have an off button.
Yeah, he's a lot like his blow-up dolls except you can't deflate him. :-)
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP
On 30 Aug 2008, at 15:02, tedd wrote:
At 12:05 AM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
To me accessibility means that everyone is able to use something to
achieve a goal regardless of their physical or mental condition.
Nothing about it says that everyone should be able to reach that
goal without
At 1:30 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
I finally managed to get to Tedds site
It's not that hard, try: http://rx-2.com
And you said:
Now, I haven't worked in pharmaceuticals, but I've worked in most
European countries. So it's probably just me, but I've _never_ come
across the Rx
At 1:20 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
I think the problem is mostly on the domain owner side though - if you
register a domain for publishing something or other, but most of your
intended audience cannot enter it in an easy, straight-forward way,
you've only shot yourself in the foot,
At 1:23 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
tedd wrote:
But as it is now, it's not so much IF the domain name is easy to
type in or not, but rather does the Rx.com show up in the URL once
you get there? And it does for most browsers other than IE.
You can get to the site very easily, try
tedd wrote:
At 1:30 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
I finally managed to get to Tedds site
It's not that hard, try: http://rx-2.com
Yeah, but that _only_ takes me to rx-2.com, nothing else?
And you said:
Now, I haven't worked in pharmaceuticals, but I've worked in most
European
At 1:38 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
Interesting - I copy-pasted the Rx symbol (from your webpage) into FF
and appended .com - and FF converted the URL symbol to xn--u2g.com.
I guess FF only works with a limited subset of the many possible special
characters.
What is happening there is
Diogo Neves schreef:
thanks,
well, the 'new' woks the same with ou without '()' after class, I think...
you think? I gave you code that shows exactly that.
but you wrote the following:
new $user = new user();
which is not correct, the first new in that line is a syntax error.
that
At 5:29 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
Well, I guess - sort of. Just because something is Unicode does not
make it global, in my opinion.
In fact, I would argue that most of Unicode is _not_ global at all.
Think about the alphabets such as: Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, Bopomofo,
Cyrillic,
Korgan schreef:
Korgan napsal(a):
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
At 3:25 PM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
in the meantime I stand by my assertion that a 'phone number people
can call with any type of telephone to interact with another human
who can get them past the check without compromising the protection
the check affords is ultimate accessibility.
Well,
please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
an hourly fee ...
Diogo Neves schreef:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diogo Neves schreef:
...
nop... I wanna manipulate the $this and the $arguments, and possible
don't even execute the
tedd schreef:
At 3:25 PM +0100 8/30/08, Stut wrote:
in the meantime I stand by my assertion that a 'phone number people
can call with any type of telephone to interact with another human who
can get them past the check without compromising the protection the
check affords is ultimate
Hi everybody,
I am running a travel community where users want to get informed on
changes inside different groups they have subscribed to.
At the moment I am doing this with a for loop that generates an
individual e-mail sent to them via phpmailer. That works, however the
submit of the
As such, if any of the regulars to this list are in need of a
recommendation, please contact me off-list.
Thank you very much! :-)
http://www.linkedin.com/in/heyesr
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing:
http://www.phpguru.org/RGraph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
an hourly fee ...
Yeap, i'm new in the list and i missed te cc of list... i'll try to
remember, sorry
Diogo Neves schreef:
Now in understand schreef is from
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:38 AM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1:38 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
Interesting - I copy-pasted the Rx symbol (from your webpage) into FF
and appended .com - and FF converted the URL symbol to xn--u2g.com.
I guess FF only works with a limited subset of
Diogo Neves schreef:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please keep replies on list unless your intending to pay me
an hourly fee ...
Yeap, i'm new in the list and i missed te cc of list... i'll try to
remember, sorry
okay.
Diogo Neves schreef:
Your reply is a bit off-topic, and i agree u should care about all
those with red/green color blindness, but u should care with all those
how dislike spam too.
Then, unless u know a really good alternative to a CAPTCHA, i believe
its yet the better solution...
PS: u can answer and discuse this on
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Diogo Neves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your reply is a bit off-topic, and i agree u should care about all
those with red/green color blindness, but u should care with all those
how dislike spam too.
Then, unless u know a really good alternative to a CAPTCHA, i
Well, i really really believe that urls should keep clear as water...
http://forcaaerea.pt should exist, and not http://forçaaérea.pt...
even because in reality its http://xn--foraarea-u0aw.pt
Its a big mess...
How to keep it clear? don't mess up with your domains if you care
about your clients
Merlin wrote:
I am thinking about placing the info on the individual e-mail inside a
ascii txt file that will be read by a cron job which will send the
e-mail instead. Something like every 5 minutes reading it line by line
and then after sending it removing the line.
e.g:
for:[EMAIL
tedd wrote:
At 5:29 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
Well, I guess - sort of. Just because something is Unicode does not
make it global, in my opinion.
In fact, I would argue that most of Unicode is _not_ global at all.
Think about the alphabets such as: Arabic, Armenian, Bengali,
Bopomofo,
tedd wrote:
What some browser developers did was to NOT make the conversion from
PUNYCODE to the correct code-points but rather show the PUNYCODE
as-is, which was never the intent of the IDNS WG. This act defeated
the entire process of allowing non-English people to have non-English
domain
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 5:29 PM +0200 8/30/08, Per Jessen wrote:
Well, I guess - sort of. Just because something is Unicode does not
make it global, in my opinion.
In fact, I would argue that most of Unicode is _not_ global at all.
look at jquery - it will make working with javascript so much easier
and has it's own community around it too.
On 8/30/08, Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good Javascript related mailing list?
Thanks.
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing:
Well, i have done that once and it worked pretty well...
Only diference was that i had a hour limit ( think dreamhost hosting )
and used Swift Mailer, but i think it don't matter a lot ;)
I think is a good solution...
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
May be jsninja has mailing list.
I am fond of jquery. so i recommend it too.
--
Blog: http://talk.cmyweb.net/
Follow me: http://twitter.com/shiplu
I wanna know how to write good code in php.
Not oop stuff. I wanna know how to write a good php code file.
documentation, comments. indentation etc.
what are the good practices??
--
Blog: http://talk.cmyweb.net/
Follow me: http://twitter.com/shiplu
On Aug 30, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Shiplu wrote:
I wanna know how to write good code in php.
Not oop stuff. I wanna know how to write a good php code file.
documentation, comments. indentation etc.
what are the good practices??
Studying design patterns are a great start to learning how to write
Hello,
on 08/30/2008 02:40 PM Merlin said the following:
I am running a travel community where users want to get informed on
changes inside different groups they have subscribed to.
At the moment I am doing this with a for loop that generates an
individual e-mail sent to them via phpmailer.
Well, I agree that sending it by an external process more specialized
in sending emails can be faster and more eficient, but it's harder to
control... sometimes you need to know in your php if email was really
sent and do something, and while I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm
sure it's a little
Hello,
on 08/30/2008 10:40 PM Diogo Neves said the following:
Well, I agree that sending it by an external process more specialized
in sending emails can be faster and more eficient, but it's harder to
control... sometimes you need to know in your php if email was really
sent and do something,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, It flance wrote:
Hi,
Apache was already installed in my computer. Anyway now i can run php
scripts without any problem. The problem is just that if a script
contains database statements like connection to the database server,
those statements are ignored while run in the
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:17:18 -0400, Shiplu wrote:
I wanna know how to write good code in php.
Not oop stuff. I wanna know how to write a good php code file.
documentation, comments. indentation etc.
what are the good practices??
Find out what bad is by reading this:
64 matches
Mail list logo
