Ryan A wrote:
Guys,
I dont mean to get into your very heartfelt flaming / arguement but can you
take this offlist please?
Cheers,
-Ryan
I suggested the same thing...albeit not as nice as you ;) and got a,
Kiss my ass response.
--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
PHP
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Bas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] BTML 2.0 released!!!
Bas,
Looks interesting. But why would I use bhtml when I've got Smarty and
10,000 other templating systems to choose from? I'm not interested in the
vauge promises of speed. I'm
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 21:07, John Nichel wrote:
I suggested the same thing...albeit not as nice as you ;) and got a,
Kiss my ass response.
WOW, 2 posts in about 2 hours, both 24 hours after the thread died.
Seems like you're the only one keeping the thread going. I'm
This was a private REPLY to you. So you're just an asshole now.
Cheers,
Rob.
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:16, John Nichel wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 21:07, John Nichel wrote:
I suggested the same thing...albeit not as nice as you ;) and got a,
Kiss my ass response.
Pablo Gosse wrote:
Hi Burhan. I have a quick question about what you write below that I
don't want to post to the whole list?
What is it meant to top post? I've mainly been a lurker in forums
such as phpbuilder and devshed until recently, but this list is proving
to be a much better resource
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:55:45PM +0300, Burhan Khalid wrote:
:
: Pablo Gosse wrote:
:
: What is it meant to top post? I've mainly been a lurker in forums
: such as phpbuilder and devshed until recently, but this list is
: proving to be a much better resource than those two.
:
: Top post
Oh.. I'm personally trying to avoid not top-posting, cause I think it's
nicer when ppl place the message at the top where I can read it instantly
without scrolling down.. :s So why bottompost?
--
// DvDmanDT
MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com
Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com
##
Please, if
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on mailing lists?
[snip]
Oh.. I'm personally trying to avoid not top-posting, cause I think it's
nicer when ppl place the message at the
Well, that's a bit overdue... I don't reverse the order of my posts... But
anyway... I guess not everyone (you for example) follow threads like I do...
--
// DvDmanDT
MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com
Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com
##
Please, if you are using windows, you may be
[snip]
Well, that's a bit overdue... I don't reverse the order of my posts...
But
anyway... I guess not everyone (you for example) follow threads like I
do...
[/snip]
If you top post you ARE reversing the order of the post. And everyone
does not follow threads the way that you do. Top posting has
I mainly bottom-post, but sometimes top-post. I love it when snobs jump in
and add no meaningful information to the technical subject of the thread
(like I'm doing now) but instead get on their soap-box about you must
always bottom post, blah, blah, blah, it messes up my way of reading.
And for
[snip]
snobs jump in
[/snip]
What is funny about that is that it is those snobs who folks ask their
questions to. It is those snobs who solve problems for others. It is
those snobs who have learned and experienced so that others may benefit.
--
PHP General Mailing List
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
snobs jump in
[/snip]
What is funny about that is that it is those snobs who folks ask their
questions to. It is those snobs who solve problems for others. It is
those snobs who have learned and experienced so that others may benefit.
Hi, while we are at it, is
Guys,
I dont mean to get into your very heartfelt flaming / arguement but can you
take this offlist please?
Cheers,
-Ryan
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Marek Kilimajer wrote:
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
snobs jump in
[/snip]
What is funny about that is that it is those snobs who folks ask their
questions to. It is those snobs who solve problems for others. It is
those snobs who have learned and experienced so that others may benefit.
On Friday 07 November 2003 21:12, DvDmanDT wrote:
Oh.. I'm personally trying to avoid not top-posting, cause I think it's
nicer when ppl place the message at the top where I can read it instantly
without scrolling down.. :s So why bottompost?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - the
I disagree. I usually trim replies regardless of whether I top or bottom
post. And while I didn't have to scroll to read this email, I often have
to scroll for longer emails when it is bottom posted. Which seems kinda
silly to me since I've already read the thread.
While I'm at it someone did
On Saturday 08 November 2003 03:35, Robert Cummings wrote:
I disagree.
Yes, I think you disagreed with me last time as well :-)
And if you keep doing that I might to forced to start using InterJinn!
I usually trim replies regardless of whether I top or bottom
post.
And kudos to you for
Robert Cummings mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, November 07, 2003 11:35 AM said:
And while I didn't have to scroll to read this email, I
often have to scroll for longer emails when it is bottom posted.
Which seems kinda silly to me since I've already read the thread.
The only reason
Actually researhc seems to be showing that our brains process visual
information in parallel versus serial. Thus your assertion seems
somewhat flawed. And I'm sure you understood my intentional typo of
researhc since your brain more than likely read it in all at once
rather than as a series of
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 14:54, Jason Wong wrote:
On Saturday 08 November 2003 03:35, Robert Cummings wrote:
I disagree.
Yes, I think you disagreed with me last time as well :-)
Great to be consistent.
And if you keep doing that I might to forced to start using InterJinn!
I think the
Well, if the historians want to read it later, that's their problem... :D
J/k, but think about all mess they have to go through when reading the posts
with comments in the middle of the mails... In my opinion it's best to read
the entire thread anyway, cause ppl trim posts...
--
// DvDmanDT
MSN:
Okay, i am happy that BTML 2.0 is released(finally)
It is also known as BTML Template Edition.
The 3 files(the parser, a simple template and a test BTML-file)
btmltpl.php
---
?php
function tpl2html($title, $images, $text, $tplfile = simple.tpl, $links =
) {
$tpldata =
Bas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:21 AM said:
Okay, i am happy that BTML 2.0 is released(finally)
You need to get a website and post a link to the site instead of posting
a giant email with code that's not even indented and probably wrapped in
some places.
--
Chris W. Parker wrote:
Bas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:21 AM said:
Okay, i am happy that BTML 2.0 is released(finally)
You need to get a website and post a link to the site instead of posting
a giant email with code that's not even indented and probably
help me?
And ditto on the comments about posting code. Please find a way to make it
readable.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Bas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] BTML 2.0 released!!!
Okay, i am happy that BTML 2.0
26 matches
Mail list logo
