Manuel,
Thanx again for your help. I will check it out this evening. Sounds like
you're a busy man. ;-) Keep up the good work.
James Potts
"Manuel Lemos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> James Potts wrote:
> >
> > Manuel,
> >
> > Thanx for
James Potts wrote:
>
> Manuel,
>
> Thanx for the excellent overview of metabase. I will give it a test drive.
> A couple further questions, if you have time:
>
> Do you execute meta commands like you do with the other db interface
> functions, e.g., odbc_connect(), odbc_select(), etc., or are
Manuel,
Thanx for the excellent overview of metabase. I will give it a test drive.
A couple further questions, if you have time:
Do you execute meta commands like you do with the other db interface
functions, e.g., odbc_connect(), odbc_select(), etc., or are you able to
encapsulate SQL between
Hello,
James wrote:
> Regarding a database abstraction package: does Metabase handle all
> "standard" SQL constructs (as opposed to vendor-specific SQL extensions)?
> The GUI applications to be ported were built with JAM, which basically
> provides an abstraction layer via its JPL language. JPL
I appreciate all your thoughts.
Miles, regarding the price-per-seat issue, it isn't a question of the number
of developers but the number of simultaneous connections to the database.
For example, a 64-user Informix license is over $5,000 ... While I doubt we
will need to maintain persistent conn
5 matches
Mail list logo
