On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> That's because one directional doesn't require a daemon that has to eat a
> high volume incoming mail cue and then decide what to do with the messages.
understood, btu there's plenty of options for nearly every type of
software out ther
mike wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, mike wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
ecartis is one option.
now this is a good lead!
except not touched since 2003 it seems.
sigh. well there was some updates in 2006, .. this whole site is
outdated and riddled with
mike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> Well, for one thing, the latter is usually for commercial purposes,
>> the former isn't.
>
> mailing lists can definately support commercial ventures. i am doing
> this for my company, in fact.
Yes, so am I, but operating t
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Well, for one thing, the latter is usually for commercial purposes, the
> former isn't.
mailing lists can definately support commercial ventures. i am doing
this for my company, in fact.
> If active development is important to you, mailman i
mike wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, mike wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Per Jessen
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ecartis is one option.
>>
>> now this is a good lead!
>
> except not touched since 2003 it seems.
>
> sigh. well there was some updates in 2006, .. this whole site is
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, mike wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> ecartis is one option.
>
> now this is a good lead!
except not touched since 2003 it seems.
sigh. well there was some updates in 2006, .. this whole site is
outdated and riddled with bad lin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
> ecartis is one option.
now this is a good lead!
> Dunno about Sympa, but is mailman really _that_ bad? For the last 4-5
> years, I've been running a few low-volume lists on mailman, works very
> well.
The configuration options give me a h
mike wrote:
> Or I suppose ANY alternatives.
>
ecartis is one option.
> There is Sympa, which seems to have an even worse reputation than
> mailman to configure,
Dunno about Sympa, but is mailman really _that_ bad? For the last 4-5
years, I've been running a few low-volume lists on mailman,
Or I suppose ANY alternatives.
There is Sympa, which seems to have an even worse reputation than
mailman to configure, and the last two seemed to have died for the
most part and have been taken over by mailman...?
Majordomo was last updated in 2000.
ezmlm
Listserv is commercial with a pretty he
9 matches
Mail list logo
