On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:56:58AM -0500, Miguel Cruz wrote:
>
> Interesting. What tests did you perform?
I used similar things, including a file('test.php') statement in
another php script and using GET from the command line.
telnet is a good test, but I didn't have it available at the time.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:01:50AM +0100, Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
>
> I can't let this go unchallenged -- what happens if you're sending this to a
> browser which *doesn't* honour the "Location: " header, but *is* capable of
> displaying any attached page content? The poor user wil
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 03 July 2002 21:17
[...]
>
> It's a good idea to get in the habit of doing:
>
> header("Location: xxx");
> exit;
>
> There's no point in sending any more data after the Location:
> header anyway,
I can't
>1) does this HTTP protocol work with all browsers?
Every one I've ever seen...
But it *might* not work with, say, Mozilla 1.0 from 1989 or so... :-)
>2) are there any complications that need to be addressed
Yes.
Once you decide to send a Location: header, all bets are off on the other
header
4 matches
Mail list logo
