-Original Message-
From: Nick Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 11:59 AM
Hi all,
yeah, i know, i did do quite a bit of searching but I just cant find it...
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and without
error? like
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:58:48 +0300, Burhan Khalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 11:59 AM
Hi all,
yeah, i know, i did do quite a bit of searching but I just cant find it...
Does anyone have
I know this is an old thread but I've been away for the weekend and I
really want to say this...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:40:45 +0200, Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know guys? I think you all take this a bit too seriously,
perdanticness (is there such a word?) is all well and good for
* and then Jim Grill declared
Guys, while we may be able to debate what is rude, what is blunt,
what should have been said, what was said, the facts are clear. He
apologized, and I think its time to lest this debate rest for now. While
I
would admit that harshness runs rampid on
On Friday 03 September 2004 02:23, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Jason Wong declared
- now re-read what I said. I rest my case.
Classic. Thankyou Jason, you're a star. I really didnt apreciate just
how inept at interaction with peers you truly were. Beautiful, very kind
of you to share
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL
Justin Palmer wrote:
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
This is not an open source list. this is a php list.
--
Raditha
* and then raditha dissanayake declared
Just shows your IQ levels.
Just because PHP is open source does not make this an open source.
I think he was talking about the 'spirit' of open source, not the
mechanics and legalities of the list. I know i was, so dont assume
please...
--
Nick W
On 02 September 2004 19:41, Nick Wilson wrote:
You know guys? I think you all take this a bit too seriously,
perdanticness (is there such a word?)
Just to be pedantic, that would be pedantry ;) !
Cheers!
Mike
-
Mike Ford,
Just to be pedantic, that would be pedantry ;) !
Is this thread ever going to die? Or would that be dye? ;)
alex hogan
*
The contents of this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
Hi all,
yeah, i know, i did do quite a bit of searching but I just cant find
it...
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
Much thanks ;-)
--
Nick W
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:59:20 +0200, Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, i know, i did do quite a bit of searching but I just cant find
it...
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
A quick google (php regex
* and then Stut declared
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
A quick google (php regex validate url) found this...
http://www.canowhoopass.com/guides/regex/
Yes, i saw that page. As I said, I have searched
On Thursday 02 September 2004 18:42, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Stut declared
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
Define FULL and WITHOUT ERROR. Without knowing what *you* mean by full
without error, I
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
)*(?:[a-zA-Z](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?))|(?:(?:\d+)(?:\.(?:\d+)
John Holmes wrote:
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
On Thursday 02 September 2004 20:52, John Holmes wrote:
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research you have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words to that
effect).
bugger off jason, if you dont understand the question dont bore me with
your silliness.
--
* and then John Holmes declared
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
Pretty funny John.
apart from
On Thursday 02 September 2004 21:08, John Nichel wrote:
What about NFS mounts? ;)
What about them? Look carefully.
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web Design Hosting * Internet Intranet Applications Development *
* and then John Nichel declared
John Holmes wrote:
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
[snip]
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research you
have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words
to that
effect).
bugger off jason, if you dont understand the question dont bore me with
your silliness.
From: Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
)*(?:[a-zA-Z](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?))|(?:(?:\d+)(?:\.(?:\d+)
[snip]
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research you
have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words to
that
effect).
bugger off jason, if you dont understand the question dont bore
* and then Jay Blanchard declared
Easy gentlemen...easy
Fair play Jay. This is not my first encounter with mr.social.skills
though ;-)
--
Nick W
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
* and then John Holmes declared
Seriously, I hope you were being sarcastic or something, Nick. Otherwise
the smart people on the list know how to use filters to tune out idiots.
I think it's a clear question. I dread coming to this list in case Jason
decides to 'tell me off' for somthing.
* and then John Holmes declared
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* and then Jason Wong declared
besides, i will not be treated that way by anyone without saying
somthing. IMO some on this list need to get out a bit more, meet some
people, aquire some manners and social skills.
I
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research you have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words to that
effect).
bugger off jason, if you dont understand the question dont bore me with
your
Jason Wong wrote:
On Thursday 02 September 2004 21:08, John Nichel wrote:
What about NFS mounts? ;)
What about them? Look carefully.
I don't know if I have that much time. :)
--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
On 02/09/2004, at 11:27 PM, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research
you have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words
to that
effect).
bugger off jason, if you dont understand the
Jay Blanchard wrote:
Easy gentlemen...easy
Who you callin' a gentleman?!?!
--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
* and then Justin French declared
On 02/09/2004, at 11:27 PM, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research
you have
done. Instead of just saying I've looked and found nothing (or words
to that
effect).
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL
From: Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thursday 02 September 2004 22:10, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then John Holmes declared
Seriously, I hope you were being sarcastic or something, Nick. Otherwise
the smart people on the list know how to use filters to tune out idiots.
I think it's a clear question. I dread coming to
answers without the bull
shit that you get here.
Regards,
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Nick Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL
* and then John Holmes declared
From: Nick
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:16 AM
To: Nick Wilson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL
On 02/09/2004, at 11:27 PM, Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then Jason Wong declared
It would be nice when asking a question to summarise what research
you have
* Thus wrote Nick Wilson:
* and then John Holmes declared
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
(?:http://(?:(?:(?:(?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d](?:(?:[a-zA-Z\d]|-)*[a-zA-Z\d])?)\.
On Thursday 02 September 2004 22:15, Justin French wrote:
No, Jason was right (in his usual, abrupt, rude kinda way).
abrupt -- maybe, rude -- no
I usually reserve my more elegant prose for my sweetheart.
Good questions get good answers.
Good advice.
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates -
Hello,
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
Usually I use this expression:
'^(http|https)\://(([-!#\$%\'*+.0-9=?A-Z^_`a-z{|}~^?]+\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,6})(\:[0-9]+)?(/)?/'
You may also want to
Justin Palmer wrote:
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
This is not an open source list. this is a php list.
--
Raditha Dissanayake.
Justin Palmer wrote:
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
This list is tame Justin.
How does that make the beginner feel? I better not ask a question, for
I fear that I will get flamed. What a joke!
How
[snip]
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
How does that make the beginner feel? I better not ask a question, for
I fear that I will get flamed. What a joke!
There are many other places to go and get
Is PHP not open source.
What a joke.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: raditha dissanayake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL
Justin Palmer wrote:
I agree Nick
On Thursday 02 September 2004 23:17, Justin Palmer wrote:
Maybe what this community needs is an advanced mailing list.
Arguments for and against splitting lists (in general and not just php lists)
into 'newbie' and 'advanced' can be found all over the web.
I think that these types of
From: Justin Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe what this community needs is an advanced mailing list.
I think that these types of attitudes just make the new user to php
stray away. If we had a section beginners list that if people asked dumb
questions, or questions that are stated dumb, some people
Justin Palmer wrote:
Maybe what this community needs is an advanced mailing list.
Don't mean to be arrogant but this has been discussed before :-) please
refer to the newby guide on how to search the archives.
I know many of you will think some contributers are arrogant. But the
truth is you
, September 02, 2004 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Regex for Validating URL OT
[snip]
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
How does that make the beginner feel? I
* and then Jason Wong declared
- now re-read what I said. I rest my case.
Classic. Thankyou Jason, you're a star. I really didnt apreciate just
how inept at interaction with peers you truly were. Beautiful, very kind
of you to share your wit and comprehension with us all.
--
Nick W
--
From: Jason Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I usually reserve my more elegant prose for my sweetheart.
Please stop call me that... it creeps me out.
---John Holmes...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
* and then John Holmes declared
Who determines advanced vs. newbie?
I think that's another discussion.
mean guys
You belittle the point. It's not about hurt feelings, it about respect
for other people and common courtesty: The cornerstones of community.
I dont have a problem with
* and then John Nichel declared
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8q=validate+url+php+regular+expressionbtnG=Google+Search
Is that enough, or do you want one of us to write the code for you too?
You misunderstand me. Im sorry you feel that way.
I'll have a look at it now,
Ahem...
No, Jason was right (in his usual, abrupt, rude kinda way).
Guys, while we may be able to debate what is rude, what is blunt,
what should have been said, what was said, the facts are clear. He
apologized, and I think its time to lest this debate rest for now. While I
would
* and then Manuel Lemos declared
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
Usually I use this expression:
'^(http|https)\://(([-!#\$%\'*+.0-9=?A-Z^_`a-z{|}~^?]+\.)+[A-Za-z]{2,6})(\:[0-9]+)?(/)?/'
DING DING DING!!
[snip]
I agree Nick for an open source community this list is not very open.
Quite a few I am better than you type people on the list.
How does that make the beginner feel? I better not ask a question, for
I fear that I will get flamed. What a joke!
There are many other places to go and get
* and then Justin Palmer declared
Is PHP not open source.
What a joke.
agreed, that was ridiculous.
--
Nick W
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John Holmes wrote:
I don't know what camp most of you consider me in and it doesn't really
matter.
Summer's over. School's back in. What are you still doing at camp? ;)
--
By-Tor.com
It's all about the Rush
http://www.by-tor.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
Would this be a good time to bring up the argument in favour of freedom
to top post?
Ducking and running,
Rob.
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 13:34, John Holmes wrote:
From: Justin Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe what this community needs is an advanced mailing list.
I think that these types of
Ahem...
No, Jason was right (in his usual, abrupt, rude kinda way).
Guys, while we may be able to debate what is rude, what is blunt,
what should have been said, what was said, the facts are clear. He
apologized, and I think its time to lest this debate rest for now. While
I
would
Nick Wilson wrote:
So chill the fuck out and be nice okay`
I'll do you one better, and just filter you outhow's that? And when
you say something like this to one of the most respected (not to mention
one of the nicest) members of this list, I'm sure I won't be the only
one. Welcome to
* Thus wrote Nick Wilson:
* and then Manuel Lemos declared
Does anyone have the regex to make sure an http address is full and
without error? like http://www.example.com
Usually I use this expression:
59 matches
Mail list logo
