Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-24 Thread Stuart
Ryan A wrote: Anyway, a 17yr old kid by the name of Mike Rowe opens up a webdesigning company and names it MikeRoweSoft (say it out loud..if you're really daft not to get it just be reading it)..then registers mikerowesoft.com...a couple of days later he gets an email from microsoft's lawyers to

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-24 Thread Freedomware
Stuart wrote: As for the argument that he's only 17, what the hell does that matter? His motivation was clearly to cash in on either the similarity or the publicity from the action MS would take. The lucky fscker got the latter. Gee, like Microsoft is such a tough sucker to hook. Frankly, I

[PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Ryan A
Hey all, heres something really interesting about that lovely company called microsoft...(heard of them?) Anyway, a 17yr old kid by the name of Mike Rowe opens up a webdesigning company and names it MikeRoweSoft (say it out loud..if you're really daft not to get it just be reading it)..then

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Brian V Bonini
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 16:00, Ryan A wrote: Hey all, heres something really interesting about that lovely company called microsoft...(heard of them?) Remarkable isn't it, I saw that article a few days ago. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit:

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Ryan A
Can I hijack an OT thread? NO, you may not. May you get boils and blisters all over your body for doing so and burn in hell for 300 years. Hehe, just kidding, I dont mind but if you do it to some of the others here they might not like it. ..then your professor may grade it. Of course,

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Tim Thorburn
At 04:00 PM 1/23/2004, you wrote: Hey all, heres something really interesting about that lovely company called microsoft...(heard of them?) Anyway, a 17yr old kid by the name of Mike Rowe opens up a webdesigning company and names it MikeRoweSoft (say it out loud..if you're really daft not to get

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Ben Ramsey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Copyright and trademark are two wholly separate things. The Kimberly-Clark Corporation has a registered trademark on the name and logo for Kleenex. Thus, no one else has a right to use the word Kleenex to describe their product. That, however,

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t) - JELLO

2004-01-23 Thread Roger Spears
Another big one is Jello It's a brand if I'm not mistakenthe product is gelatin Jello brand gelatin but all forms of pudding and gelatin are sometimes referred to as Jello... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t) - JELLO

2004-01-23 Thread Ben Ramsey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As a humorous sidenote, I meant to say: let's hope that Windows (a registered trademark brand of Microsoft) doesn't get to the level of name recognition where the consumer refers to all graphical desktops as Windows. ;-) Roger Spears wrote: | Another

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Ryan A
Hey, I totally disagree, this does not disgust me just because this guy is 17, it would even if a 40yr old *millionaire* went through the same thing, I would think it wrong For example, I firmly believe that a farmer growing and selling apples it totally within his rights to have a website

RE: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread jon
probably could've handled it more tactfully, but they were required to take action. -- jon -Original Message- From: Ryan A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t) Hey all, heres something

Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread John Nichel
jon wrote: I'm not sure if it's obvious to you geeks, but for those who don't know trademark law, you need to defend your trademark or it falls into the public domain. Hence, if Canon's copiers refer to how well they xerox, then it's a problem. (Same way for Jello, Kleenex, etc...) Microsoft's

RE: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread E. Stuart Hicks
bring the whole precedent concept up next time they chase after someone. Stu -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t) jon wrote: I'm not sure if it's

RE: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread E. Stuart Hicks
Oops. Make that 'there *aren't* many other collective groups...'. My typing's a bit off today. -Original Message- From: E. Stuart Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t) Between

RE: [PHP] Why we love Microsoft (0t)

2004-01-23 Thread Robin Kopetzky
Microsoft's lawyers probably could've handled it more tactfully, but they were required to take action. Simple solution to a complex problem - Follow William Shakespeare's outlook or the joke 'What's a thousand lawyers at the bottom of the ocean called? - A good start...' Robin 'Sparky'