On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:43, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Richard Heyes wrote:
> > Robert Cummings wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:02, Richard Heyes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Readability is in the eye of the beholder.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> But efficiency isn't ;)
>
> yes it is actually - everything is in
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:31, Richard Heyes wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:02, Richard Heyes wrote:
> >
> >>Readability is in the eye of the beholder.
> >
> >
> > But efficiency isn't ;)
>
> Try measuring the difference between the various methods over a
> realisti
On 21 Nov 2005, at 15:43, Jochem Maas wrote:
using sprintf() is
such a simple case may be excessive BUT I was merely introducing
the OP to
something new (possibly) - anyone asking such 'simple' questions is
not at a stage that this kind of efficiency is an issue (i.e. give
them 'whats possibl
Richard Heyes wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:02, Richard Heyes wrote:
Readability is in the eye of the beholder.
But efficiency isn't ;)
yes it is actually - everything is in the eye of the beholder.
it just so happens that we often have consensus ;-)
with regar
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:02, Richard Heyes wrote:
Readability is in the eye of the beholder.
But efficiency isn't ;)
Try measuring the difference between the various methods over a
realistic number of iterations, eg. 100. There's little point in going
through ones
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 10:02, Richard Heyes wrote:
>
> Readability is in the eye of the beholder.
But efficiency isn't ;)
Cheers,
Rob
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:-
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 09:42, Chris Boget wrote:
and I feel it would be more elegant to be able to do something like:
$var ="first part of string {(($a==$b)?$c:$d)} rest of string";
$templateStr = 'first part of string %s rest of string';
$outputStr = sprintf($template
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 09:42, Chris Boget wrote:
> >> and I feel it would be more elegant to be able to do something like:
> >> $var ="first part of string {(($a==$b)?$c:$d)} rest of string";
> > $templateStr = 'first part of string %s rest of string';
> > $outputStr = sprintf($templateStr, (($a==
and I feel it would be more elegant to be able to do something like:
$var ="first part of string {(($a==$b)?$c:$d)} rest of string";
$templateStr = 'first part of string %s rest of string';
$outputStr = sprintf($templateStr, (($a==$b)?$c:$d));
That is so totally slick! I'm definitely going t
On 18 Nov 2005, at 20:13, Dylan wrote:
$var = "first part of string ".(($a==$b)?$c:$d)." rest of string";
and I feel it would be more elegant to be able to do something like:
$var ="first part of string {(($a==$b)?$c:$d)} rest of string";
Strange as it may seem, you'll probably find that th
Dylan wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to use the ($test)?$true:$false construction in a (double
quoted) string without dropping out of the string and concatenating? I have
many lines like:
$var = "first part of string ".(($a==$b)?$c:$d)." rest of string";
and I feel it would be more elegant to be abl
Richard Lynch wrote:
> On Fri, November 18, 2005 2:13 pm, Dylan wrote:
>> Is it possible to use the ($test)?$true:$false construction in a
>> (double
>> quoted) string without dropping out of the string and concatenating? I
>> have
>> many lines like:
>>
>> $var = "first part of string ".(($a==$b)
On Fri, November 18, 2005 2:13 pm, Dylan wrote:
> Is it possible to use the ($test)?$true:$false construction in a
> (double
> quoted) string without dropping out of the string and concatenating? I
> have
> many lines like:
>
> $var = "first part of string ".(($a==$b)?$c:$d)." rest of string";
>
>
Hi
Is it possible to use the ($test)?$true:$false construction in a (double
quoted) string without dropping out of the string and concatenating? I have
many lines like:
$var = "first part of string ".(($a==$b)?$c:$d)." rest of string";
and I feel it would be more elegant to be able to do somethi
14 matches
Mail list logo
