On Thu, November 2, 2006 3:01 pm, Alan Milnes wrote:
Robin Vickery wrote:
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, November 2, 2006 3:01 pm, Alan Milnes wrote:
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display your details to the world if accessed directly.
On Fri, November 3, 2006 1:12 pm, Jon Anderson wrote:
Or you can .htaccess Deny From All them out... That's my preferred
solution. It keeps the include tree near the code that accompanies it
without risking anything even if they're called *.php.
Until you upgrade Apache and forget to enable
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Fri, November 3, 2006 1:12 pm, Jon Anderson wrote:
Or you can .htaccess Deny From All them out... That's my preferred
solution. It keeps the include tree near the code that accompanies it
without risking anything even if they're called *.php.
Until you upgrade
Mel wrote:
Your advice is well taken and thank you.
I do have a book with the help of which I made this site and I have been
working on it for many many weeks. (ashamed to say exactly how many!)
Remember your first ever php site?
Yep, it was for a Fortune 500 company, but that's not the
At 4:00 PM -0800 11/1/06, Mel wrote:
I am sure there are things even you don't know or understand
Hey, that's not the first time I've heard that -- who's spreading
that rumor? The subject line is not directed at me, is it? :-)
As I think Will Rogers once said We're all ignorant, only in
Robin Vickery wrote:
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't call files .inc - call them .inc.php if you really must have the
inc somewhere, that way the Web Server will actually treat it as a php
file and not display your details to the world if accessed directly.
Alan
Better still, keep them outside the docroot. If you do insist on having them
inside and insist on calling them *.inc, create an .htaccess file that stops
download of *.inc files.
Thank you both so much. I did change the name. I was chocked to see
all my passwords displayed in the browser!
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:15 PM, Dave Goodchild wrote:
Better still, keep them outside the docroot. If you do insist on
having them
inside and insist on calling them *.inc, create an
Mel wrote:
I do have a book with the help of which I made this site and I have been
working on it for many many weeks. (ashamed to say exactly how many!)
Remember your first ever php site?
No
I am sure there are things even you don't know or understand and that
you can use help from other
Bad day?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 09.55 skrev Mel:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55 -0800, Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
That's a bit like asking us to read your mind. We'd only be guessing
since we can't see your code and you haven't told us what your site
does.
What I can say is
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55 -0800, Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
That's a bit like asking us to read your mind. We'd only be
This is my first php site and I have no idea where to look for a reason!
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:07 AM, Frank Arensmeier wrote:
Bad day?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 09.55 skrev Mel:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
--
PHP General Mailing List
Maybe it's the 18 k of JavaScript from Google that slows your page
down? Why not load this script locally from your server?
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.26 skrev Mel:
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 00:55
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 01:26 -0800, Mel wrote:
So do you mean that's it is ok and not slow?
I'm saying we can't ascertain why it's so slow since we don't have
enough information.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework -
My suggestion: stripp out the JS from Google. Test you page again.
Should the page load as slowly as before, it might have to do with
PHP. Then, give us more details about your script)
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.53 skrev Robert Cummings:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 01:26 -0800, Mel wrote:
So do
Please send a CC of your answer to the PHP list as well...
/frank
Vidarebefordrat brev:
Från: Toby Osbourn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: onsdag 1 nov 2006 10.57.17 GMT+01:00
Till: Frank Arensmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: [PHP] why so slow?
Yeah it will be that hit counter or whatever
I took the Google stuff out. I can't tell if it's faster now.
I don't think it's very consistent. Sometimes it loads pretty fast
and sometimes it gets stuck in the right corner!
I don't think I have seen this happen with any other site!
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Frank Arensmeier wrote:
My
as well...
/frank
Vidarebefordrat brev:
Från: Toby Osbourn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: onsdag 1 nov 2006 10.57.17 GMT+01:00
Till: Frank Arensmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Re: [PHP] why so slow?
Yeah it will be that hit counter or whatever it is you are trying
to load - I had one myself that used
Frank Arensmeier wrote:
My suggestion: stripp out the JS from Google. Test you page again.
Should the page load as slowly as before, it might have to do with
PHP. Then, give us more details about your script)
/frank
1 nov 2006 kl. 10.53 skrev Robert Cummings:
On Wed,
Why do you have html tags before your doctype declaration?
Anyway, I am not sure if your problem has to do with PHP after all.
Again, if you think that it is related to PHP, show us some code.
There are still other things to consider (server, external files, CSS
- neither of those things
Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
perhaps its the server that its hosted on, is it a dedicated
machine,shared or a virtual private server.
It could also be the bandwidth the server has,
It could be the route taken to get to the
:)
I know it is a dedicated server on westhost.com
I wouldn't know how to check for the kind of connection!
thanks, and all the best...
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:10 AM, clive wrote:
Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
perhaps its the
The guys are right, there are many variables that could be affecting this.
However, get rid of those tags before body and clean up your code - it
does not validate as html 4.01. The DOCTYPE should be the very first thing
in the page. Once you have amended these, revalidate (validator.w3c.org).
ok, thank you. I am on it!
On Nov 1, 2006, at 3:24 AM, Dave Goodchild wrote:
The guys are right, there are many variables that could be
affecting this.
However, get rid of those tags before body and clean up your code
- it
does not validate as html 4.01. The DOCTYPE should be the very
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the code for a testing page: http://www.squareinch.net/
client_testing.php?art=btw_logo.jpg
I am sure it is a mess since it is my first!!!
[]
include(http://www.squareinch.net/include/misc.inc;);
Don't do that - publishing your
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you so much.
Yes, I was afraid of putting my passwords...
I can move the include file outside the directory, but what do you
mean by include the file directly
Please respond to the list
What I meant was to do this:
ok
I have fixed my html and include
http://www.squareinch.net/client_testing_html401.php
could you please help me figure out how to change the query in box 4
so that it shows the url only when the link is active?
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:11 AM, Robin Vickery wrote:
On 01/11/06, Mel [EMAIL
Take out the comment before the DOCTYPE. There should be nothing before it.
I have
this is the page I am working on right now and it is valid html 4.01
http://www.squareinch.net/client_testing_html401.php
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Dave Goodchild wrote:
Take out the comment before the DOCTYPE. There should be nothing
before it.
No you have not, otherwise we would not be seeing:
!-- * start header --
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd;
html
head
when we SHOULD be seeing
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
Mel wrote:
I have
this is the page I am working on right now and it is valid html 4.01
http://www.squareinch.net/client_testing_html401.php
Bzzttt. No, it isn't.
The people here have been pretty accommodating of you so far, but if you
continue to *not* do any research yourself,
In fact, validator.w3.org validates the hmtl page at http://
www.squareinch.net/client_testing_html401.php as valid 4.01 html. So
obviously, html comments are allowed before the doctype declaration.
Anyway, the page contains almost one hundred (haven't count them)
totally unnecessary empty
On Wed, November 1, 2006 2:55 am, Mel wrote:
Could you think of why my site loads so slowly?
http://www.squareinch.net/home.php
Install Firefox and an HTML Validator.
Look at your View Source
Your !doctype isn't even the first line! :-)
That urchintracker() stuff will probably kill
Your advice is well taken and thank you.
I do have a book with the help of which I made this site and I have
been working on it for many many weeks. (ashamed to say exactly how
many!) Remember your first ever php site?
I truly do appreciate all the help I got and it did lead me to
36 matches
Mail list logo
