I will definitely agree that there are a few inconsistencies in the
function naming... more than likely due to the many many contributors,
and a lack of strict naming conventions.
Never quite understood (for example) why half of the string based
functions are named str* and the other half
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:15:00 -0500, you wrote:
I will definitely agree that there are a few inconsistencies in the
function naming... more than likely due to the many many contributors,
and a lack of strict naming conventions.
My pet hate:
bool array_walk (array, function)
array array_map
* Thus wrote Jay Blanchard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I will definitely agree that there are a few inconsistencies in the
function naming... more than likely due to the many many contributors,
and a lack of strict naming conventions.
Actually there is a scrict nameing convetion.
Never quite
[snip]
Um.. is it jay or justin or both? This kind of confused me :)
[/snip]
Justin inadvertently did not reply to all and instead sent the e-mail
directly to me as a response. I forwarded it to the list and should have
noted that. Although I do have days where I feel as if I am someone
else,
4 matches
Mail list logo
