On 17 April 2008 11:57, Bojan Tesanovic advised:
in PHP5 by default Objects are passed by reference
Please stop repeating this -- erm -- inexactitude.
In PHP5, objects are passed around by their handle, *not* as a
reference. Most of the time, this has the same effect, as you are
addressing the
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 23:37 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
all,
i have heard from various sources that using the in php can at times be
costly, and therefore, it should not be used when it is not needed. for
example, passing an array by reference because you think youre passing the
actual
On Apr 17, 2008, at 5:37 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
all,
i have heard from various sources that using the in php can at
times be
costly, and therefore, it should not be used when it is not
needed. for
example, passing an array by reference because you think youre
passing the
actual array
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If it's faster, it's faster so that would suggest a performance gain...
but as many will tell you, and you most likely already know... is the
gain worth the effort? BTW, rote replacement of references like that,
may
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Bojan Tesanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in PHP5 by default Objects are passed by reference and as you can see at
this graph passing array by reference in PHP5 is slower
http://nathan.moxune.com/arrayVsArrayIteratorReport.php
wow, thats hilarious, thats my
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Bojan Tesanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in PHP5 by default Objects are passed by reference and as you can see at
this graph passing array by reference in PHP5 is slower
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Bojan Tesanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in PHP5 by default Objects are passed by reference and as you can
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Eric Butera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Bojan Tesanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Riedel wrote:
letters 0 and 1. My tree-traversal algorithm looks like this:
$bit_array = str_split( $bitstring );
$tree_climber = $tree; // assign tree-climber to the
tree root
// main loop
while( !is_null( $bit = array_shift( $bit_array ) ) ) {
$tree_climber =
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:49:07AM -0500, Michael Sims wrote:
above is necessary. If you merely need to traverse $bit_array without actually
modifying it then I suspect a simple foreach would be much faster, but I'm probably
missing something...
Ah, I just changed that and now it's a
1megabyte of code :)
not 1M lines
sorry about that confusion there
and the problem began slow, not noticable... But it's now worse then ever.
Jon Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Hi Karel,
mysql entries: at least 2M
php code: at least 1M lines
More than a million lines of code? That's a *big* app.
1megabyte of code :)
not 1M lines
Aha :-)
and the problem began slow, not noticable...
But it's now worse then ever.
Are you doing something that degrades,
12 matches
Mail list logo
