http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to
Migrate from PHP to
ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs from Microsoft and let
everybody knows if they are
all TRUE and MEANIFUL atall or they are
2008. 02. 27, szerda keltezéssel 10.03-kor Dare Williams ezt írta:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to
Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:03 -0800, Dare Williams wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to
Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs from
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Dare Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to
Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs
On 2/27/08, Zoltán Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008. 02. 27, szerda keltezéssel 10.03-kor Dare Williams ezt írta:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why
to Migrate from PHP
Dare Williams wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason
why to Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this
proofs from Microsoft and let everybody knows if
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*lol* Look at the examples on the page... aks yourself if you enjoy
typing 2 to 3 times as much to do the same thing.
*lol* This is one of the same reasons why I'm using Ruby on Rails
more and PHP less, all the time.
--
Greg Donald
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 12:53 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*lol* Look at the examples on the page... aks yourself if you enjoy
typing 2 to 3 times as much to do the same thing.
*lol* This is one of the same reasons why I'm using Ruby on
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language.
Really? I had not heard that previously.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
where were you in the big ruby stand-off a couple weeks back ? :D
-nathan
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language.
Really? I had not heard that previously.
ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
better pack something good for a
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
where were you in the big ruby stand-off a couple weeks
On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
better pack something good for a comeback :O
my heads still smoking while i try to think up something
moderately so ~:(
I'm not gonna just sit here and watch someone *lol* comparing the
Psh, if you're going to talk about RoR, might as well talk about PoP...
Python on Planes!
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/01/176239
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/27/08, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Psh, if you're going to talk about RoR, might as well talk about PoP...
Python on Planes!
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/01/176239
Yeah, I love me some good April Fool's jokes, especially the 4 year old variety.
--
Greg
Well, I was going to ignore this comment, but given the smart-alecky nature
I have to comment that the post date is April 1st 2007. Today is February
27th, 2008. Not only is that not 4 years, but its less than 365 days. You
may want to brush up on your math skills my friend. And your humor skills
On 27 Feb 2008, at 18:36, David Giragosian wrote:
The comparisons are fairly biased against PHP, as expected from the
source, and a number of links are broken, particularly the one
offering 5 full applications with source code. But I do have an
install of the full Visual Studio .NET, and
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:19 -0500, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RoR is a framework, not a language. I also save crapload of typing by
using my InterJinn framework. Ruby as a language doesn't float my boat.
where were
On 2/27/08, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Feb 2008, at 18:36, David Giragosian wrote:
The comparisons are fairly biased against PHP, as expected from the
source, and a number of links are broken, particularly the one
offering 5 full applications with source code. But I do have an
To the extent of my knowledge ASP is simply the server-side scripting
engine, and most of the programming is actually done in visual basic, or any
other scripting language you decide to use so long as its somehow putting
money in microsoft's pocket. Think along the lines of Perl (the interpreter)
://www.fortheloveofgeeks.com
I¹m a geek and I¹m OK!
--
From: Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: InterJinn
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:12:12 -0500
To: Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??
I thought ASP
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is ASP really a framework? Did I get that wrong... I'm not always
right you know, especially about MS crap.
From the first mentioned article:
ASP.NET is part of the Microsoft .NET Framework. The .NET Framework is
a feature of Windows...
On 2/27/08, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I was going to ignore this comment, but given the smart-alecky nature
I have to comment that the post date is April 1st 2007. Today is February
27th, 2008. Not only is that not 4 years, but its less than 365 days. You
may want to brush up
[snip]
I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework.
I was under this impression as well.. I always equated .NET to ASP the
same
way I would ZEND to PHP...
[/snip]
Think of ASP like you would JBoss or Tomcat - it is an application
server. Most folks used VBScript as the language
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is ASP really a framework?
.Net has upwards of 70K classes. If that's not a framework then I
dunno what is.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
At 10:03 AM -0800 2/27/08, Dare Williams wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the
reason why to Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify
this proofs from Microsoft and let
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 14:29 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On 2/27/08, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is ASP really a framework?
.Net has upwards of 70K classes. If that's not a framework then I
dunno what is.
No need to keep confusing me... I got better answers form other
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:39 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:03 AM -0800 2/27/08, Dare Williams wrote:
Dear Developers,
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:41 -0600, Greg Donald wrote:
On 2/27/08, Nathan Nobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ya; rob; greg is like the new dude on the witty block;
better pack something good for a comeback :O
my heads still smoking while i try to think up something
moderately so ~:(
I'm
At 3:46 PM -0500 2/27/08, Matty Sarro wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a
fun language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
Well, the subject line did ask for Truthful and when it comes to
M$, what I had to say was directed at M$'s credibility.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
Not to mention the ability to add (at the time) decent graphics to
an application as opposed
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:30 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE:
[PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ?? [snip] I thought ASP was
the language and .NET was the framework. I was under this impression
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Bastien Koert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:30 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC:
php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] Are these Truthful
Nah, I try to keep the 2.0 subtle, where its just cool...some others here use
it as a shotgun to kill the fly...just to say the product does it...
bastien
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:26:01 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??CC
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
--
Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Manager
MQC Specialist
3251 132nd ave
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Jason Pruim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
That
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way back-in-the-day. So simple!
Not to mention the ability to add (at the time) decent graphics to
At 4:29 PM -0500 2/27/08, Jason Pruim wrote:
On Feb 27, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Matty Sarro wrote:
Its not bleeding edge unless it's web2.0 ;)
I actually just found out the other day from tedd that he's already
writing in web3.0... So it's time to catch up!
Yeah, but don't follow me down that
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way back-in-the-day. So
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought ASP was the language and .NET was the framework.
Not exactly. .NET is the framework, but ASP is not a language. The
most common languages for .NET development are usually Visual Basic
and C#. However, lots of
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
language to program in way
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Matty Sarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Completely off subject, but man I miss quickbasic... that was such a fun
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The plus side is that you
can include modules written in different languages into the same
project.
that was actually really cool when i first looked at it.
nowadays there are tons of projects where scripting
languages
: Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:01:22 -0600
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Are these Truthful Proof about PHP ??
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, if I recall correctly, I normally had to start with increments
of 100.
I always started with 10 and incremented by 10 in both MS and GW
BASIC (and on TI, C64, LASER, etc.), because then I could go back and
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, if I recall correctly, I normally had to start with
increments
of 100.
I always started with 10 and incremented by 10 in both MS
At 2:15 PM -0800 2/27/08, Stephen Johnson wrote:
Talk about a thread hijack... LOL
In my day we had to write basic going up hill in the snow... Both ways...
You had snow?
In my day it was just glaciers -- as far as the eye could see.
We used to freeze our rocks -- I did mention that that's
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, if I recall correctly, I normally had to start with increments
of 100.
I always started with 10 and incremented by 10 in both MS and GW
BASIC (and on TI, C64, LASER, etc.), because
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Dare Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Developers,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479002.aspx
I read an Article on the above Microsoft website stating the reason why to
Migrate from PHP to ASP.NET. So can you please justify this proofs
49 matches
Mail list logo
