On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:13:37 -0700, Ed Lazor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Add a new FAQ section on what information to collect when
> troubleshooting PHP related problems and how this information can help you
> find solutions as quickly as possible - including details on how to discern
> whethe
At 22:43 22-09-2004, Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:31:09 -0500, Jay Blanchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> php-db exists already.
> [/snip]
>
> That's too general, don't you think? :7)
I dunno, maybe. I ask my database questions on an actual database
list if possible. I think
* Thus wrote Ed Lazor:
> Here's are two ideas:
>
> 1. Add a section to the PHP mailing list page with information on where to
> find official mailing lists for Apache, Javascript, and MySQL. Also add a
> link to the FAQ section created in idea #2.
This would be nice but if you look at the bulle
Here's are two ideas:
1. Add a section to the PHP mailing list page with information on where to
find official mailing lists for Apache, Javascript, and MySQL. Also add a
link to the FAQ section created in idea #2.
2. Add a new FAQ section on what information to collect when
troubleshooting PH
> [snip]
>> No, list works just fine as it is with a mix of the new comer and
> advanced
>> users. No need to split in any way.
>
> I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one for
>
> javascript ;-)
> [/snip]
>
> Three...Apache
>
> --
How about php-check-your-firewall
--
On Thursday 23 September 2004 04:27, Greg Donald wrote:
> I don't think anyone would subscribe to php-js, except peeps with
> questions.
What do you mean php-js? Just a plain javascript only list, we don't want no
stinkin' php stuff on a javascript list. What has php got to do with
javascript?
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:31:09 -0500, Jay Blanchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> php-db exists already.
> [/snip]
>
> That's too general, don't you think? :7)
I dunno, maybe. I ask my database questions on an actual database
list if possible. I think most people probably feel the same, I
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:29:01 -0400, John Nichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Four...Just for flames. ;)
My local Linux Users Group went the other way. They made a list serv
just for n00bs. It has one rule only, no flames.
--
Greg Donald
http://gdconsultants.com/
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:26:01 -0500, Jay Blanchard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three...Apache
php-install should cover that.
I think php-oo would be nice however.
--
Greg Donald
http://gdconsultants.com/
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, v
[snip]
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:23:18 +0800, Jason Wong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one
for
> javascript ;-)
php-db exists already.
[/snip]
That's too general, don't you think? :7)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
T
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
No, list works just fine as it is with a mix of the new comer and
advanced
users. No need to split in any way.
I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one for
javascript ;-)
[/snip]
Three...Apache
Four...Just for flames. ;)
--
John C. Nichel
Übe
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:23:18 +0800, Jason Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one for
> javascript ;-)
php-db exists already.
I don't think anyone would subscribe to php-js, except peeps with questions.
--
Greg Donald
http://gdcons
[snip]
> No, list works just fine as it is with a mix of the new comer and
advanced
> users. No need to split in any way.
I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one for
javascript ;-)
[/snip]
Three...Apache
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscri
On Thursday 23 September 2004 03:41, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> No, list works just fine as it is with a mix of the new comer and advanced
> users. No need to split in any way.
I suggest adding another two lists (at least), one for mysql and one for
javascript ;-)
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associ
This one time, at band camp, raditha dissanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was refering to "is php-general too *general* for advanced php5 users"
> not specifically at php 5.
No, list works just fine as it is with a mix of the new comer and advanced
users. No need to split in any way.
Kev
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Just wondering.
With the advent of php5 with its OO capabilities, is php-general too
*general* for advanced php5 users?
This topic has been discussed at least once a month. Please refer to
list archives.
I wasn't aware of this. So I searched MARC using the terms "php5
mai
raditha dissanayake wrote:
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Just wondering.
With the advent of php5 with its OO capabilities, is php-general too
*general* for advanced php5 users?
This topic has been discussed at least once a month. Please refer to
list archives.
I wasn't aware of this. So I searched MARC u
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Just wondering.
With the advent of php5 with its OO capabilities, is php-general too
*general* for advanced php5 users?
This topic has been discussed at least once a month. Please refer to
list archives.
--
Raditha Dissanayake.
18 matches
Mail list logo
